Viewing 15 posts - 16,576 through 16,590 (of 59,067 total)
Deny Christian (10/18/2016)
Jeff Moden (10/18/2016)
Deny Christian (10/18/2016)
I still confuse about Restoring:Specify the source and location of backup sets to restore:
from database
from device
what's the different ?
FROM DATABASE is typically used only...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2016 at 12:49 am
Deny Christian (10/18/2016)
I still confuse about Restoring:Specify the source and location of backup sets to restore:
from database
from device
what's the different ?
FROM DATABASE is typically used only when you want to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2016 at 11:37 pm
Bruce-12445 (10/18/2016)
Correct me if I'm wrong: I'll create...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2016 at 11:33 pm
Eirikur Eiriksson (10/13/2016)
Further on Jeff's fine reply, here is an example of "Generic" table auditing with few extras for education and entertainment.
Correct me if I'm wrong, please. It would...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2016 at 11:29 pm
@Patrick123 (10/14/2016)
thanks
I see that you've marked the checksum method as your choice. Please, see my warning about the checksum method a little further up in this discussion.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2016 at 11:23 pm
CELKO (10/13/2016)
Have you considered getting a third party audit tool? Why reinvent the wheel, expose yourself to legal problems, and slow your overall performance?
I've found that most 3rd party audit...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2016 at 11:21 pm
Create a stored procedure to return what they want. Give them privs to run the stored procedure and have the stored procedure execute as owner. That way, you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2016 at 9:10 pm
PearlJammer1 (10/18/2016)
As ever, your thoughts are greatly appreciated so thanks for your input on this. I have posted the script that I finally used to return what i am...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2016 at 8:47 pm
Deny Christian (10/18/2016)
jasona.work (10/17/2016)
homebrew01 (10/17/2016)
andrew gothard (10/17/2016)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2016 at 8:00 pm
Bruce-12445 (10/18/2016)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2016 at 7:42 pm
Just to throw my opinion into the ring...
I've been tremendously successful and I barely know how to spell SSIS, SSDT, SSAS, SSRS, or any of the other 4 letter words...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2016 at 7:28 pm
When I've run into such things, I create an audit table that's nearly identical to the original table. I say nearly identical because I create the table with no...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2016 at 7:14 pm
compufreak (10/18/2016)
okay i have an issue and i am going to seek the help of some experts here...
basically i created a formula... something like this spj(16909)(a/3)+spj(16212)(a/3/3)+spj(16214)(a/3/3)+spj(16918)(a/3/3)+spj(16472)(a/3/3)+spj(16473)(a/3/3)+spj(16779)(a/3/3)
Problem is the "IDs"...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2016 at 7:00 pm
Since this appears to be for a WBS structure, will you have additional levels than the two that you currently have?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2016 at 6:58 pm
If you have a lot of calculations that return the same answer and a lot of people calling the same reports and being "this instant up-to-date" just isn't necessary, consider...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2016 at 6:37 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 16,576 through 16,590 (of 59,067 total)