Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
Crazy, absolutely crazy!!!
What do we win with this SQL Server behaviour?????????
May 31, 2012 at 8:01 pm
Hugo Kornelis (5/10/2012)
L' Eomot Inversé (5/10/2012)
The wrong answer made no points difference to me, because I managed to get it utterly...
May 10, 2012 at 4:42 am
Tricky question indeed.
Well, but I can't find any difference between the result obtained and my response: When the table contains sparse columns and a sparse column set, then any null...
May 10, 2012 at 2:06 am
Hugo Kornelis (5/9/2012)
jalvarocrespo (5/9/2012)
But, IMO, the reason would be the fact that ID2 must be set as NOT NULL to enable the creation of the index.
Nope. You can create an...
May 9, 2012 at 2:18 am
I failed the response only by a misplaced options. :angry:
But, IMO, the reason would be the fact that ID2 must be set as NOT NULL to enable the creation of...
May 9, 2012 at 2:01 am
damn it! MISTAKE with the cycle/no cycle argument not related with the start value!
I didn't know that the start value for the sequence is the maximum for a ascending sequence....
April 24, 2012 at 5:46 am
damn it! MISTAKE with the cycle/no cycle argument not related with the start value!
I didn't know that the start value for the sequence is the maximum for a ascending sequence....
April 24, 2012 at 5:45 am
K. Brian Kelley (5/20/2011)
Simple answer: ownership chaining. 🙂
Thanks Brian,
Very obviously, but I didn't remember. :blush:
May 20, 2011 at 11:30 am
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)