Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
From MS
"SQL server will choose a plan with less cost, in your case SQL choses merge join plan as its cost it less than hash join... this is by design....
October 1, 2010 at 11:11 am
The "fix" for this was enabling trace flag 2335
DBCC TRACEON (2335, -1)
More notes from...
September 20, 2010 at 9:14 am
Here is what I've gotten from Microsoft.
Looking through the plan I see that there is a difference in how SQL is generating the query plan for the same query under...
September 10, 2010 at 7:42 pm
If the OS were running out of resources it would take 30 seconds to run the query when I had 48 GB installed and 48 GB allocated to SQL. It's...
September 10, 2010 at 12:07 pm
Another interesting bit of information:
(Physical RAM Config) SQL Allocation - Time it took
(6x8GB) 48GB allocated to SQL - Query takes 6 seconds
(12x8GB) 84 GB allocated to SQL – Query takes...
September 10, 2010 at 11:19 am
Derrick Smith (9/10/2010)
What is the total ram on the...
September 10, 2010 at 8:33 am
Ran a test while tracking swap file disk usage.
SQL set to use 84 GB max memory
6 seconds for the query
SQL set to use 92 GB max memory
30 seconds for the...
September 10, 2010 at 8:13 am
ALZDBA (9/10/2010)
If only I would have noted the source ref in my script :blush:
--/* These settings are for x64,...
September 10, 2010 at 6:28 am
Interesting note, if we change the max dop to 8 from 0 we can set RAM back to 2 TB and get that query down to 5-6 secs.
September 10, 2010 at 6:26 am
ALZDBA (9/10/2010)
They pointed to a bug in W2008R2 and proposed the following hotfix a the solution: Win2008R2_Win7_HotFix_KB2265716 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2265716
Does this apply to...
September 10, 2010 at 6:06 am
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)