Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 164 total)
basically SQL Server creates a job to run log reader as and when agent starts. If that is created properly you are fine. (Delays are possible when the publisher, distributer...
Cheers,
Prithiviraj Kulasingham
http://preethiviraj.blogspot.com/
July 6, 2005 at 3:21 am
This workaround may help you.
After the snapshot replications ( both tables )are created (let me say them are created as DB1_TableX and DB2_TableX) , stop the agent for a while.
Copy the...
Cheers,
Prithiviraj Kulasingham
http://preethiviraj.blogspot.com/
July 6, 2005 at 3:14 am
Weird! Ident_Current('TableX') should be null if you are running the query from SQL1. (I assume you don’t have the same table in SQL1)
However, If it is working..Dont break...
Cheers,
Prithiviraj Kulasingham
http://preethiviraj.blogspot.com/
March 23, 2005 at 11:09 pm
This is one of the areas where you may need to query system tables. The following query returns all tables and their identity values. (I assume that the identiy columns are...
Cheers,
Prithiviraj Kulasingham
http://preethiviraj.blogspot.com/
March 23, 2005 at 9:58 pm
My apologies... Just a few minutes back I found another area where we need to access system tables: to identify current identity values on linked server. you article is usefull in that...
Cheers,
Prithiviraj Kulasingham
http://preethiviraj.blogspot.com/
March 23, 2005 at 9:01 pm
I mentioned 3 points... Unfortunately all negative points:
1. The crisis is nothing to do with Identity. It is regarding DB design. I believe all agree on that.
2. This is...
Cheers,
Prithiviraj Kulasingham
http://preethiviraj.blogspot.com/
March 23, 2005 at 7:54 pm
All data types have their limits. This crisis is nothing specific to Identity columns. It is related to lack of upfront planning.
Additionally, Microsoft always recommends us to use Information_Schema views and...
Cheers,
Prithiviraj Kulasingham
http://preethiviraj.blogspot.com/
March 23, 2005 at 2:33 am
Hi,
Thank you for oyur reply.
The existing publication contains some vary large tables, (millions of records) so if I drop and re-create the subscription, will I have a new snapshot...
Cheers,
Prithiviraj Kulasingham
http://preethiviraj.blogspot.com/
February 14, 2005 at 6:00 pm
The second index appears like a "covering index". it will be usefull to read the data directly from index without going to the data pages.
Another thing i can see...
Cheers,
Prithiviraj Kulasingham
http://preethiviraj.blogspot.com/
August 9, 2004 at 2:17 am
Let me share some of my thoughts on this.
First of all I would like to admit that I am a bit clueless on this issue. ![]()
Cheers,
Prithiviraj Kulasingham
http://preethiviraj.blogspot.com/
August 5, 2004 at 12:58 am
thank you very much for your valuable comments. I am sorry, I should have elobrated it in the first place itself. However, if you have any issues, please feel free...
Cheers,
Prithiviraj Kulasingham
http://preethiviraj.blogspot.com/
June 9, 2004 at 5:47 am
yes.
Cheers,
Prithiviraj Kulasingham
http://preethiviraj.blogspot.com/
June 9, 2004 at 5:38 am
before running your statements, run this statement:SET DateFormat dmy
remember; this statement is connection wide.
Cheers,
Prithiviraj Kulasingham
http://preethiviraj.blogspot.com/
June 9, 2004 at 5:28 am
Fron what i gathered, you can create proc using any language.![]()
check http://www.codeproject.com/Purgatory/NET.asp for further details
Cheers,
Prithiviraj Kulasingham
http://preethiviraj.blogspot.com/
June 9, 2004 at 5:15 am
better design would be you seperate them into 2 fields and connect seperately
However, this would do:
Select A.*, B.client_ID from BDI A, Client B where substring(A.clientref,1,6) = B.clientref and...
Cheers,
Prithiviraj Kulasingham
http://preethiviraj.blogspot.com/
June 9, 2004 at 5:00 am
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 164 total)