Viewing 15 posts - 14,776 through 14,790 (of 22,211 total)
yessen (6/24/2010)
GilaMonster (6/23/2010)
June 25, 2010 at 5:49 am
balasach82 (6/24/2010)
right now, a bit confused. "The trace file wont tell you how many transactions there have been , for that you need to summarise the perfmon data"... any idea...
June 24, 2010 at 8:16 am
GilaMonster (6/23/2010)
Hehehttp://icanhascheezburger.com/2010/06/23/funny-pictures-call-911/
http://icanhascheezburger.com/2010/06/22/funny-pictures-no-wayz/
Yeah, the planet should send that second down to SA.
June 23, 2010 at 12:59 pm
Yep, it really is down to the OS.
In general file fragmentation shouldn't be that big a deal. Have you eliminated all other issues on the server that could cause performance...
June 23, 2010 at 10:24 am
Whoa! No, don't do that. You'll be shooting yourself in the face (yes, face, not foot). I put out a small blog post[/url] on this, just today, that addresses this...
June 23, 2010 at 8:12 am
Ninja's_RGR'us (6/22/2010)
Grant Fritchey (6/22/2010)
In general, especially for the size of systems you're talking about, I'd seperate these installs to seperate machines.
2 or 3?
They're not even sure they need the technologies,...
June 22, 2010 at 1:16 pm
In general, especially for the size of systems you're talking about, I'd seperate these installs to seperate machines.
June 22, 2010 at 11:53 am
GilaMonster (6/22/2010)
Grant Fritchey (6/22/2010)
I'll see if I can't get others to comment on it as well.
What happens if the user goes for lunch leaving the screen open, then decides to...
June 22, 2010 at 9:33 am
Inserts or deletes are occurring on the system at the same time that you're trying to read it, but the information that was being scanned has been moved. One of...
June 22, 2010 at 9:23 am
A little help over here would be appreciated
June 22, 2010 at 9:19 am
mshah23 (6/22/2010)
What is the problem do you see on the above solution?
Just as a starting point, what happens if, within the transaction you're holding open, you need to read...
June 22, 2010 at 9:17 am
mshah23 (6/22/2010)
That's why I want...
June 22, 2010 at 8:36 am
By and large in SQL Server you don't want to try to control locking. In general it does row level locking by default, all on it's own.
Why are you...
June 22, 2010 at 8:15 am
Greg Edwards-268690 (6/22/2010)
Paul White NZ (6/22/2010)
Schadenfreude-Mei (6/22/2010)
Seriously, how do these people get to a point where they are even alowed to look at a live server :crazy:
I guess it's because...
June 22, 2010 at 6:30 am
Assuming that you're using SQL Server 2005 or above since you're posting in the 2005 forum, why not use TRY/CATCH syntax for the error handling? This eliminates messy GO TO...
June 22, 2010 at 6:17 am
Viewing 15 posts - 14,776 through 14,790 (of 22,211 total)