Viewing 15 posts - 14,131 through 14,145 (of 22,211 total)
Prayer and living sacrifices to the gods...
Barring that... It's not that bad. It could be worse. It could be SQL Server 6.5.
Standard stuff. Make sure you have backups in place....
October 7, 2010 at 1:04 pm
Brandie Tarvin (10/7/2010)
jcrawf02 (10/7/2010)
October 7, 2010 at 12:38 pm
Gianluca Sartori (10/7/2010)
hahnorlaska (10/7/2010)
October 7, 2010 at 11:24 am
Alex-815008 (10/7/2010)
I'm surprised there is such a limitation because I thought that actually it was common for there to be...
October 7, 2010 at 11:23 am
Alex-815008 (10/7/2010)
I've searched that article for "resolution" since that seemed to be a key part of what you were saying, but I only found references to...
October 7, 2010 at 7:52 am
vijay1327-891581 (10/7/2010)
But the problem is the company does NOT allow to run the profiler due to some policies. hence I was trying to find if ther...
October 7, 2010 at 7:06 am
Alex-815008 (10/7/2010)
Grant Fritchey (10/7/2010)
Because one of those errors is dependent on resolution of action, it's not caught by the TRY/CATCH. It's explained here.
Which link in that reference should I follow...
October 7, 2010 at 7:02 am
I'd look at the other wait states and queues on the system. You know you're getting lots of disk i/o's, but why? You need to figure out what is causing...
October 7, 2010 at 6:48 am
Without the execution plan it's just guess work to what's going on. Remember, just because you see an index referred to in the execution plan doesn't mean it's being used...
October 7, 2010 at 6:45 am
Basically, I'd rely on perfmon for those metrics. It's should be gathering what you need.
The real question is, what are you trying to figure out? What's happening on the...
October 7, 2010 at 6:42 am
Regularly running at 50-80ms for page life isn't good. I'd look to see if you're getting good plan reuse, are you getting lots of recompiles? I'd also take a look...
October 7, 2010 at 6:40 am
Because one of those errors is dependent on resolution of action, it's not caught by the TRY/CATCH. It's explained here.
October 7, 2010 at 6:36 am
That's a server level query. The security setting on it is View Server State, not View Database State. So it includes the DB_ID so that you can filter for a...
October 7, 2010 at 6:32 am
barry.smallman (10/7/2010)
Yes, I tried amending the SP to query the sys.dm_exec_connections DMV as suggested in the reply by Lowell!!
When the stored procedure failed to run this morning, I started investigating...
October 7, 2010 at 5:31 am
CirquedeSQLeil (10/6/2010)
Grant Fritchey (10/6/2010)
Alvin Ramard (10/6/2010)
Grant Fritchey (10/6/2010)
Alvin Ramard (10/6/2010)
Are we there yet?
See what I miss by trying to have a life & stuff. Gotta stop doing things away from...
October 6, 2010 at 8:09 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 14,131 through 14,145 (of 22,211 total)