Viewing 15 posts - 9,841 through 9,855 (of 22,213 total)
Funny you should ask this because the newest version of Access is running SQL Server. The Jet engine is gone. It's just a really fancy GUI on top of SQL...
May 7, 2013 at 8:52 am
rodjkidd (5/7/2013)
Some pictures of a couple of people you may know of from the Medieval evening as SQLbits...Cheers,
Rodders...
Ah, Templar photo-bombing at it's best. WHOOP!
May 7, 2013 at 4:48 am
Still back to mine and Lynn's original answer. The view has fewer columns than the base tables and that alone can make the difference. Also, it's possible that the statistics...
May 7, 2013 at 3:48 am
Yeah, pretty much. The execution time and the resources used are reasonably accurate measures. The estimated costs are just that, estimates. They are the only numbers we have within execution...
May 7, 2013 at 3:43 am
sivapragasam2000 (5/6/2013)
In my previous job, I always used CTEs and they were much faster when compared to temp tables.
In the current place, strangely enough Temp tables...
May 6, 2013 at 4:39 pm
If we're talking about a table that records the transaction and a table that stores the list of transactions, assuming you want to automatically generate the ID on the transaction...
May 6, 2013 at 12:08 pm
I'm not sure which query we're talking about (i looked at and commented on the other post), but the whole idea behind creating an indexed view is to take advantage...
May 6, 2013 at 12:03 pm
Two points.
Those costs are estimated costs. They don't necessarily relate in any way to reality. You really can't compare two queries through the costs. Not realistically.
Having multiple queries in...
May 6, 2013 at 12:01 pm
Jeff Moden (5/6/2013)
Grant Fritchey (5/6/2013)
May 6, 2013 at 9:30 am
A single straight update statement all by itself can't cause a deadlock with another update/insert/delete statement. So, other statements within these query batches must be involved. Since you're on 2008,...
May 6, 2013 at 5:53 am
Just remember that if you have a clustered index that is not unique, then SQL Server makes it unique through an internal process called a uniquifier. It's additional storage and...
May 6, 2013 at 5:46 am
I think this might be posted on Ask.SQLServerCentral too. But you want to use sys.dm_tran_session_transactions. That will let you get transactions for a session or a session for a transaction.
May 6, 2013 at 5:44 am
Forgot about this article[/url] completely. It's got the same title as your question, part of why I alerted to this one.
May 6, 2013 at 5:22 am
Jason has it right. Unless you're running differentials, you can just run a regular full backup.
Since you're just getting going, you might want to check out Shawn McGehee's book on...
May 6, 2013 at 5:19 am
Jeff Moden (4/30/2013)
L' Eomot Inversé (4/30/2013)
April 30, 2013 at 3:37 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 9,841 through 9,855 (of 22,213 total)