Viewing 15 posts - 8,176 through 8,190 (of 22,214 total)
OK. I think I somewhat understand now. The thing is, you're going to NULL values, you have to. You have a mismatched set of rows across the tables, so some...
May 13, 2014 at 4:35 am
Never tried that. I'd just uninstall and reinstall. Safer that way.
May 12, 2014 at 4:09 pm
So, I'm unclear how your tables map together. What are the primary and foreign keys that define the relationships. That ought to drive us towards a meaningful query. As it...
May 12, 2014 at 4:08 pm
Stefan Krzywicki (5/12/2014)
Ed Wagner (5/12/2014)
Stefan Krzywicki (5/12/2014)
TomThomson (5/12/2014)
Ed Wagner (5/12/2014)
Sean Lange (5/12/2014)
Lynn Pettis (5/12/2014)
Sean Lange (5/12/2014)
Ed Wagner (5/12/2014)
May 12, 2014 at 3:04 pm
Didn't the query show you what was in the memory? It came from somewhere on the system within your SQL server instance. Maybe it's just all index maintenance scripts that...
May 12, 2014 at 10:15 am
John Mitchell-245523 (5/12/2014)
Indeed. Hence the warning about performance.John
I do occasionally have reading problems. And this was one of them. Apologies.
May 12, 2014 at 10:00 am
Of course, the function on that column will preclude index seeks.
May 12, 2014 at 9:54 am
I'm with Gail. I'm just guessing without an execution plan.
And joining millions of rows is more costly than simply selecting millions of rows. That's just how it works. Joining 2...
May 12, 2014 at 9:48 am
Without seeing the execution plan we're just guessing, but this index:
pk_ss_pLevelID clustered, unique, primary keylocated on PRIMARY pLevel, pLevelID
Strikes me as potentially problematic. What does the data in pLevel look...
May 12, 2014 at 8:58 am
You can just go and look at it. Here's a blog post from Microsoft that shows how.
Even if the database hasn't been touched for weeks, if it was in use,...
May 12, 2014 at 8:11 am
I'd say, test it out and see how it works. The inserted table is available from a trigger. As long as you designate it as an AFTER trigger... test it.
May 12, 2014 at 7:51 am
SQL Server will just fill the memory on a machine right up to the limit you give it, or, to the point where it contends with the OS for memory....
May 12, 2014 at 7:31 am
For the test to past, both records have to be there, so you can't really automate it from the database end since either record could be missing at the moment...
May 12, 2014 at 7:24 am
I think I would probably do this programmatically. I mean, if you tried using a trigger that stopped inserts of an A type row unless there was already a B...
May 12, 2014 at 6:13 am
Back to an area that I'm not sure about. I don't know.
May 12, 2014 at 5:17 am
Viewing 15 posts - 8,176 through 8,190 (of 22,214 total)