Viewing 15 posts - 8,026 through 8,040 (of 22,224 total)
You can try to kill the process that is running, but, if it's part of a transaction, then you'll still have to wait for the transaction to complete it's rollback...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 10, 2014 at 4:35 am
Well, I have used Visual Studio 2013 to create a MASD database before, so I'd be inclined to think it might be something to do with your configuration possibly. Maybe...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 9, 2014 at 4:12 pm
mikeg317X (6/9/2014)
Grant Fritchey (6/9/2014)
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 9, 2014 at 3:49 pm
A full backup records everything going on in the system, all the transactions that are running during the backup process, those that finish, those that don't. It all gets written...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 9, 2014 at 11:56 am
And you see that where, in the properties? No, I can't say that's one I've run into. It sounds like something might be broken. Can you save the execution plan...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 9, 2014 at 11:38 am
I have only seen this error when I run a table creation script that doesn't have a primary key definition. You can't have a CREATE TABLE definition and an ALTER...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 9, 2014 at 11:30 am
You are posting in a SQL Server 2008 forum. Since you're using Sybase, you're more likely to get specific assistance by posting the question in a forum dedicated to that...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 9, 2014 at 11:28 am
What kind of execution plan are you seeing that in? A graphical plan, a text plan or something else?
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 9, 2014 at 11:23 am
Basically you can put IF logic within an in-line function to determine which table to query. That way the code refers to one thing, but the function breaks the output...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 9, 2014 at 6:10 am
It could be you don't have the right service packs in place on the 2000 version to upgrade to 2008R2. Do a quick search for the Upgrade Advisor from Microsoft....
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 9, 2014 at 4:46 am
There's no easy way to do this, like Kevin says. One thing you can try is to use either views or in-line functions to expose a common object name to...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 9, 2014 at 4:44 am
Red Gate SQL Compare works quite well with Windows Azure SQL Database.
Disclosure, I work for Red Gate.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 9, 2014 at 4:38 am
SQL Server prevents changes from occurring at the same time. It's part of the Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durabality (ACID) properties of the database. You can't both SELECT a row...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 9, 2014 at 4:34 am
Yeah, of course. Both processes are going to use CPU and memory and I/O. Therefore there's a very distinct possibility that the two processes may be in contention on those...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 9, 2014 at 4:32 am
Extended events is not easier than trace, but it's pretty easy and certainly has less impact on the server. Books Online will get you going.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 5, 2014 at 2:50 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 8,026 through 8,040 (of 22,224 total)