Viewing 15 posts - 3,181 through 3,195 (of 22,214 total)
May 8, 2018 at 11:52 am
May 8, 2018 at 11:33 am
Also could be that the optimizer fixes are enabled/disabled on one of the databases and not the others. That would certainly lead to differences, especially if the query is already...
May 8, 2018 at 4:58 am
May 7, 2018 at 7:49 am
Ah, a restore won't move the logins. You'll need to script those out on the original server and move them over.
May 4, 2018 at 9:49 am
The missing indexes are, at best, suggestions. Be very cautious in simply implementing them.
As to the connections, step through it as granular as possible. What login do...
May 4, 2018 at 6:33 am
More than one drive and more than one drive controller would be better. SQL Server is IO intensive.
May 4, 2018 at 6:29 am
Part of the upgrade process should be testing. You should be moving the database or databases in question in a non-production environment where you can validate whether or not your...
May 3, 2018 at 6:26 am
If you would be embarrassed to let your grandmother read your post maybe...
April 27, 2018 at 7:46 am
And change the data types so that you're storing date and time as date and time. Same thing goes for any other data type.
April 27, 2018 at 6:27 am
Not a clue how to address your specific issue, but, one HUGE point.
The GUI for Profiler has a different memory management mechanism within SQL Server than the server-side...
April 27, 2018 at 6:25 am
April 27, 2018 at 5:14 am
You can only get that information if you are gathering query metrics in some fashion. Since you're posting in a 2008 forum, the general method for this is to use...
April 27, 2018 at 5:00 am
When thinking about performance of the database, two things should drive your processes. First, you only get one clustered index and it defines data storage. Therefore, the most common path...
April 27, 2018 at 4:57 am
[/quote]
I...
April 25, 2018 at 4:03 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 3,181 through 3,195 (of 22,214 total)