Viewing 15 posts - 3,091 through 3,105 (of 22,204 total)
Strong recommendation.
Don't use the ring buffer target. It's very attractive, but it leads to problems. Read this post by Jonathon Kehayias for details.
July 26, 2018 at 7:30 am
One immediate concern I would raise with whoever has asked you to back up a table instead of the database. How do you restore it? You need a plan for...
July 26, 2018 at 7:28 am
Target and Total Server Memory are frequently identical after the server has been running for a bit. SQL Server will consume the memory available and then hold on to it....
July 26, 2018 at 7:26 am
I'd monitor it using Extended Events (or if you're on 2008, Trace Events). You can capture the query. You won't see the data, but you can see the query.
July 25, 2018 at 11:44 am
Yeah, I agree with Drew. Rather than try to capture the SELECT statement, just capture the data from the data modification through the OUTPUT clause.
July 25, 2018 at 7:56 am
A backup and a restore followed by data cleansing would be a lot easier.
Otherwise, if you're moving subsets of data, especially since it's going to be relational data,...
July 25, 2018 at 7:17 am
If you mean something along the lines of, within T-SQL:
SELECT * FROM LastSelectResultSet
Then the answer is no. However, if you want to see what's happening on your server,...
July 25, 2018 at 4:54 am
July 25, 2018 at 4:42 am
However if...
July 24, 2018 at 12:43 pm
July 24, 2018 at 12:42 pm
The issue is, getting the exact detailed information isn't going to radically change the majority of your systems and it costs a lot more to produce. So, slightly better information...
July 24, 2018 at 10:10 am
Pls, note that "RESTORE DATABASE" needs the database name.RESTORE DATABASE [?????]...
July 24, 2018 at 7:20 am
What Jeff said. And in situations like this, execution plans are our friends.
July 23, 2018 at 8:03 am
I actually had to think about that one for a minute. Nice.
July 23, 2018 at 7:50 am
July 19, 2018 at 9:16 am
Viewing 15 posts - 3,091 through 3,105 (of 22,204 total)