Viewing 15 posts - 21,886 through 21,900 (of 22,184 total)
Yeah, you'll need to change the app. The methods for accessing system metadata within SQL 2005 are different than they were in 2000. The views that look like the old...
April 18, 2007 at 7:01 am
That completely depends on your environment. For example, we have a server environment where some 3rd party apps are running that need 'sa' log-in in order to operate (can I...
April 18, 2007 at 6:57 am
Nope, sorry. Common Table Expressions are new in 2005.
April 18, 2007 at 5:12 am
I read this yesterday and wasn't sure what you're looking for. Would a common table expression work? This is derived from BOL:
WITH TableX AS
(SELECT e.ManagerId, e.EmployeeId, 0 AS Level
...
April 17, 2007 at 11:58 am
If you run a query against the sys.sysobjects system view in the master db, do you still see it?
SELECT * FROM sys.sysobjects
WHERE NAME = 'sp_executesql'
If so, note the type. It's...
April 17, 2007 at 11:50 am
What are you trying to do? There is a view available, sys.foreign_keys, which shows the basic information on a given set of keys within a database. Is that what you're looking...
April 17, 2007 at 11:46 am
Yeah, especially since M:M is usually done through a third table.
April 17, 2007 at 11:35 am
Since you can only restore to a point in time you need some method of determining which transaction is your final point. You might want to check Lumigent LogExplorer or...
April 17, 2007 at 11:31 am
You have that 100% correct. As a matter of fact, the BOL says you can't mirror between two servers on the same cluster. Although, if you set up active/active clusters...
April 17, 2007 at 6:00 am
Yes, it does provide availability. The way that it was described to us when we were working with the Dell consultants on our last cluster configuration was that for high...
April 16, 2007 at 11:58 am
Are the indexes in reference used in the update queries? If so, you need those indexes. You may or may not want to rebuild them before and after (and if...
April 16, 2007 at 11:06 am
Agreed. I'd go for the partitioning first. It's complete seperate from the other architecture decisions and work.
After that, clustering gives you availability and mirroring gives you redudancy. These can be...
April 16, 2007 at 11:00 am
Hey Lynda,
We're starting up a PASS Chapter in Southern New England. It's hard work. The only thing that I've found interesting so far is how easy it is to get...
April 16, 2007 at 9:52 am
You can't really get these types of counters directly out of SQL Server 2000. But in 2005, you can reference the dynamic management views such as sys.dm_os_performance_counters. Run the select...
April 16, 2007 at 8:11 am
Yeah, I'd drop the clustered index and make the PK clustered. It's as you said, the leading edge to the PK is the same as the clustered index, so one...
April 16, 2007 at 7:58 am
Viewing 15 posts - 21,886 through 21,900 (of 22,184 total)