Viewing 15 posts - 21,826 through 21,840 (of 22,194 total)
Pig Pile!
Seriously though, everyone got it right. Replication has the type of behavior you're looking for. It won't seriously impact your performance (configured correctly) and it's a lot more fault...
May 16, 2007 at 6:57 am
Very interesting stuff. Thanks for sharing. I'd love to know if you do find any kind of memory leak since, from a performance stand point you already proved that it...
May 15, 2007 at 6:32 am
Yeah, I've read a lot of that stuff. I was just wondering if anyone had come up with a compelling, real-world, example of using CLR and getting more or better...
May 14, 2007 at 3:42 am
Can you post the query plan as XML? It sounds like you might be missing an index which is why you're getting the work table in tempdb. Possibly in the...
May 11, 2007 at 7:12 am
I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but I think you you're looking for something along the lines the OPENROWSET command. Look it up in Books Online.
May 10, 2007 at 11:01 am
What about sys.server_principals & sys.server_role_members? You can also go to each database and look at sys.database_principals and sys.database_role_members on each database.
May 10, 2007 at 7:07 am
Hate to say this, but, it depends. There's no inherent advantage of a stored proc over a SQL statement. It's execution plan re-use that you're actually shooting for. However, Agent...
May 10, 2007 at 6:55 am
Crud. I should have read more closely. Good job. Man I feel stupid.
May 9, 2007 at 12:06 pm
That is odd. Try running Profiler against the table as you do the work. Use the statement starting and statement completion events in addition to the normal ones. That way...
May 9, 2007 at 11:15 am
I don't know. I copied down all your code and walked through it. It's working fine. No issues. No errors. I was able to insert values using your script (with...
May 9, 2007 at 10:49 am
Total agreement. There's a constraint you're not seeing or there's a trigger you're not seeing or, probably, both.
May 9, 2007 at 9:28 am
Keep an eye on it. We once had a query, so badly written, that recompiles took over two minutes. We'd get time outs about once every 17 or 18 minutes...
May 9, 2007 at 9:18 am
Sure sounds like the trigger may be affecting the data. Can you, without violating business integrity, post the table definition and trigger? Also, you mentioned the incrementing id value? Is...
May 9, 2007 at 6:43 am
I have seen differences in how the query optimizer behaves in 2005. Overall, I think it's much better, but it acts choosy. Is it possibly going into recompile? Or is there...
May 9, 2007 at 6:32 am
I'm a bit confused. There are three things at work here. First off, creating a procedure
CREATE PROCEDURE x
AS
--followed by creating a table within the proc
--drop it first
IF EXISTS (SELECT *...
May 8, 2007 at 7:04 am
Viewing 15 posts - 21,826 through 21,840 (of 22,194 total)