Viewing 15 posts - 21,646 through 21,660 (of 22,184 total)
Jack Corbett (10/15/2007)
[/quote-0]
I have to admit to not being confident on this one. I would define it by saying it occurs when SQL uses...
October 15, 2007 at 11:51 am
Maybe it's Rhode Island? But we ask these questions:
What's the difference between clustered & non-clustered index
What's the difference between blocks and deadlocks
What kind of recovery models does a database have...
October 15, 2007 at 11:49 am
I've been involved with hiring DBA's where I work for the last three years. It's been a frightful experience. We eliminate most candidates in a ten minute phone call. While...
October 15, 2007 at 10:05 am
I went through a period of swapping jobs quite a lot. It was those damned dot coms. Funny thing was, I took a pay cut each time I jumped because...
October 15, 2007 at 9:56 am
There is a difference between simply including a column and adding it to the index. You add a column to the index because it is part of sorts, searches, joins,...
October 15, 2007 at 9:13 am
No, not a simple equi-join, no. A simple outer join, yep.
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Advanced+Querying/outerjoinmystery/2382/
October 15, 2007 at 8:26 am
Can anyone show me a single instance of any individual walking through 1m records one at a time? Every time I've been given the requirement "we need to see all...
October 15, 2007 at 7:56 am
Maybe I'm confused, but you can't browse the transaction logs. The error logs, which you can browse, aren't going to show much from "activity" but rather from logged events, errors...
October 15, 2007 at 7:52 am
antony (10/15/2007)
You can update you query in best way like below
Update TableA set a.col3=b.colc,a.col4=ColD,a.col5=ColE from TableA a, TableB b
Where b.ColA = a.Col1
Its similar like the join Query. Try This...
October 15, 2007 at 7:35 am
In the interest of completion. Here's the execution plan for the latest solution. I'd stick with the simple join statements:
October 15, 2007 at 6:10 am
Actually, I can add one more bit of info:
http://www.simple-talk.com/sql/performance/sql-server-performance-crib-sheet/
October 15, 2007 at 5:55 am
Jeff Moden (10/14/2007)
October 15, 2007 at 5:46 am
Jeff Moden (10/13/2007)
October 15, 2007 at 5:42 am
No, we're not searching against it. We simply return it as XML. I have looked into using the XML indexes, but that nine times data storage that I keep reading...
October 12, 2007 at 9:32 am
We are using it in some places. The purpose is pretty much self-explanatory, we want to persist XML data and having an XML data type for storage ensures that we're...
October 12, 2007 at 8:34 am
Viewing 15 posts - 21,646 through 21,660 (of 22,184 total)