Viewing 15 posts - 21,391 through 21,405 (of 22,195 total)
Well, see, I'm right!
😀
December 11, 2007 at 9:31 am
It's basically telling you that the procedure had a high enough cost that it thought parallel execution would help. When executing in parallel, it caused a deadlock. First one I've...
December 11, 2007 at 9:28 am
SriSun (12/11/2007)
Actual process: I check for @geolevel (doesn't exist), call another procedure (proc1 which takes couple of parameters along with @geolevel) and...
December 11, 2007 at 9:15 am
You only want to put that stuff in as a last resort, usually because of some sort of design error, bad index, or something else that you can't spend time...
December 11, 2007 at 7:01 am
What Jason said.
But remember, it's going to force the optimizer to make other choices. Every so often those other choices might work better, but then it's because the HASH join...
December 11, 2007 at 6:59 am
Connect with a user that has more restricted rights to the file.
December 11, 2007 at 6:39 am
You wanted four rows instead of three, right? Try this:
select typeId, trypename, typeInfoDesc
from types t left join typeinfo ti
on t.typeId = ti.typeInfoId
AND typeinfoId2 = @infoNr
December 11, 2007 at 6:37 am
In a case like this, use the tool above or, if you want to roll your own, SMO (SQL Management Objects) allows you generate SQL scripts by object or for...
December 11, 2007 at 6:05 am
But if you're using the GUI and you still need to change the schema, display the properties page from the table creation screen. You can change the schema there. Same...
December 11, 2007 at 6:02 am
It can be useful if you're returning a large amount of data and you don't want to wait for all the rows to process prior to the data returning. You...
December 11, 2007 at 5:58 am
If you're getting primary key violations, something else is up. You may also need to post the structure of the table you're inserting into.
Is that the complete procedure? Is there...
December 11, 2007 at 5:50 am
We use just 1204. I'm wondering though if we shouldn't switch it over to 1222. The XML output looks easier to read. Anyone using that?
December 11, 2007 at 5:27 am
Not stupid, you just needed a nudge.
I've been going around telling all & sundry that the bit data type wouldn't take a null. Then Gail just simply tells me I...
December 11, 2007 at 5:19 am
Instead of VARCHAR, if you use NVARCHAR, that might address the issue.
December 10, 2007 at 1:06 pm
I love the missing index DMV's. They're not a panacea either, but they sure can help you spot something simple quickly.
December 10, 2007 at 12:34 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 21,391 through 21,405 (of 22,195 total)