Viewing 15 posts - 20,956 through 20,970 (of 22,196 total)
If I understand the question, you could add an extended property to identify the current version of the procedure.
March 3, 2008 at 6:42 am
You'll have to walk through the databases on the server. Try something like this. It'll work, but it's not perfect.
sp_msforeachdb 'select DB_NAME() AS ''DBName''
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES t
WHERE t.TABLE_NAME = ''Customer'''
March 3, 2008 at 6:40 am
I agree with what most everyone has posted here. We have ten questions we ask everyone. They're really easy questions, insulting even, if you know SQL Server to even a...
March 3, 2008 at 6:22 am
Make sure you do the initial read to get the next 100 unflagged records with UPDLOCK (update lock) so that those records are no longer available for the next user...
March 3, 2008 at 5:37 am
Sorry, I'm just not that acquainted with the details of implementation any more. I wrote a whole app against direct calls to ODBC about 13 years ago, but... It's all...
February 29, 2008 at 11:41 am
Sorry, missed 3) I agree. Cursors are a killer. It doesn't much matter if it's client or server side. However, if you're talking disconnected, then client side is the least...
February 29, 2008 at 9:46 am
I don't know, I've seen your posts, Jack. You look pretty knowledgeable. I know I could learn from you.
BTW, we are hiring over here in the Island of Rhode (aka...
February 29, 2008 at 9:43 am
diallonina (2/29/2008)
Let me know your views and your experiences concerning this:
1-A SQL consultant told me that SQL performance was better when it connects/deconnects to every request by...
February 29, 2008 at 9:23 am
Not a problem.
You want one more, take a look at the execution plan and be sure that it's using a good index to select the record. You might be doing...
February 29, 2008 at 8:50 am
Nice article Kathi. Good job.
February 29, 2008 at 7:35 am
February 29, 2008 at 7:13 am
When you say database integrity, do you mean, data integrity as defined by primary keys, foreign keys, constraints, etc. or are you looking at database consistency and running the database...
February 29, 2008 at 7:11 am
You'll need to set a flag on the table itself, marking the records that no one else can access and include that check in your queries.
Otherwise, you have maintain...
February 29, 2008 at 7:01 am
Cool. Sounds like you're in the right track.
February 29, 2008 at 6:35 am
Sorry, I was spending more time thinking about the logic than the syntax. You can cut my pay for this job. 😉
How about something like this (this assumes one row...
February 29, 2008 at 6:34 am
Viewing 15 posts - 20,956 through 20,970 (of 22,196 total)