Viewing 15 posts - 20,566 through 20,580 (of 22,202 total)
Hmmm, it's a covering index? Change the order of the columns then. You mentioned earlier that the statistics were up to date and the index wasn't fragmented, right?
You're getting a...
April 24, 2008 at 9:38 am
Stupid question, I realize, but being the stupid guy in the stack, it's my job.
What service pack are you currently running?
April 24, 2008 at 9:33 am
I just checked, squealservercentral.com is available. Steve?
Or maybe we should set up a parody site. We could use Brandy's pirate themes...
April 24, 2008 at 9:30 am
It sounds like you've covered everything from a DBA standpoint. It's starting to sound like some type of hardware issue, drivers, the OS, something along those lines. Sorry this hasn't...
April 24, 2008 at 9:00 am
I'd say no. The only thing you can do is eliminate the lookup by including or adding columns to the nonclustered index. Are you sure you can't do an include?...
April 24, 2008 at 8:57 am
Hmmm, no performance counters is an issue, although probably not a symptom of the performance problem. That makes it more difficult to know what's going on. Have you run Profiler?...
April 24, 2008 at 8:50 am
Bummer. Then you'll need to create a compound index, at least based on my tests. The query is basically OK (since you fixed the implicit data conversion, those things will...
April 24, 2008 at 6:33 am
Start here. Then try here. Then go here. You could also do a search of articles here at SQL Server Central.
April 24, 2008 at 6:30 am
I'd check to see if you've got open connections and possibly uncommitted transactions. For it to just degrade linearly over time means that resources are being consumed and not released....
April 24, 2008 at 6:25 am
Absolutely. If you can't find a local copy of books online, you can refer to them at MSDN.
April 24, 2008 at 6:19 am
No, based on the data I tested with, 1000 rows not 7 million, the date column alone didn't supply a selective enough non-clustered index for the optimizer to choose it...
April 24, 2008 at 6:16 am
I thought I had seen that 10% number too. Here's where it's referenced.
April 24, 2008 at 6:11 am
You've effectively got a cursor going on with that query running in the SELECT statement. I'd try it like this:
SELECT a.OrderID
,a.UniqueID
...
April 24, 2008 at 5:34 am
I don't know about the DBCC thing. Sorry.
It sounds like you've got a CREATE statement inside your procedure definition. That's a problem. You'll need to remove that.
April 23, 2008 at 9:06 am
It really depends on the shop. I've worked where I was the System Administrator, DBA and Developer. Now I work for a largish company where we have 14 DBA's. I...
April 23, 2008 at 8:42 am
Viewing 15 posts - 20,566 through 20,580 (of 22,202 total)