Viewing 15 posts - 20,536 through 20,550 (of 22,202 total)
codevault33 (4/29/2008)
April 29, 2008 at 9:17 am
No, it's an implicit commit. I just got the same results. I ran this query against Adventureworks:
SELECT soh.[SalesOrderID]
,sod.[SalesOrderDetailID]
FROM Sales.[SalesOrderHeader]...
April 29, 2008 at 9:12 am
It is a small world. I was on SSN606, Tinosa (a pile of glowing razor blades now). I was nuclear power machinist mate. In other words I used a slightly...
April 29, 2008 at 8:52 am
It sure beats working on a nuclear powered submarine in terms of pay, benefits, hours, cleanliness... Yeah, I'd say it's still a good career.
April 29, 2008 at 6:47 am
I'd have to see the procedure to understand why you're getting a difference. But I think, and I could be wrong about this, the batch includes the commit, but the...
April 29, 2008 at 6:45 am
To give you a specific answer you need to post specific information, the two tables & some sample data. See here: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/
In general, you shouldn't have to do cursors or...
April 29, 2008 at 6:05 am
To give you a specific answer, sample structures and data and code are necessary. To give you a general answer, take a look at the execution plans for the queries...
April 29, 2008 at 5:58 am
A statement is a single piece of work, whereas a batch is a whole set of work.
So, for example:
DECLARE @Id INT;
SET @ID = 52;
SELECT *
FROM dbo.MyTable
WHERE Id = @Id;
That...
April 29, 2008 at 5:48 am
I posted the same question at Connect. One of the MS reps gave me a good response.
https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=244214
April 29, 2008 at 5:44 am
I've been burned way too many times by poor use of functions to be any kind of advocate for them. However, if you really want to drill down on them,...
April 29, 2008 at 5:37 am
The queries work well when the data is loaded, but don't work when the tables are empty? I think the previous post may be right, the execution plans are still...
April 28, 2008 at 6:52 am
Doggone it! I was getting excited that I might be able to tell you something rather than ask you something.
😛
April 28, 2008 at 6:40 am
As to your initial question, it's two schema's in one database, not two databases.
As to your further explanation that you'll be bringing other applications online. As the other applications come...
April 28, 2008 at 5:24 am
Any performance degredation is not linear. Depending on how you're working with the system, there may be very little degredation at all. In the instances within the article, we were...
April 27, 2008 at 8:32 pm
Personally, I would have two schema's within the same database. This will allow you to lock down one schema, but have referential integrity between the schemas where as you would...
April 25, 2008 at 8:59 am
Viewing 15 posts - 20,536 through 20,550 (of 22,202 total)