Viewing 15 posts - 19,981 through 19,995 (of 22,224 total)
You're stuck. You can only reference what constitutes a candidate key, a pk or unique index and then the whole thing or the leading edge... You could create a second...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
July 14, 2008 at 11:18 am
But you still have to change the context to run the ALTER/CREATE/whatever script on each of the different environments.
That said, listen to Brandie. Fight the very idea of running...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
July 14, 2008 at 11:15 am
Not seeing the code, this might not be applicable, but if you're creating the same derived tables over and over again as part of the query of the view, you...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
July 14, 2008 at 11:08 am
Snapshot replication is a one-time, either on demand or scheduled, operation where an entire database structure and all it's data (but not the security settings, etc.) are copied from one...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
July 14, 2008 at 8:51 am
If I understand the question, the thing you're looking for is a snapshot. That's an immediate copy of the entire database.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
July 14, 2008 at 8:25 am
Well, that depends. If you have the keys needed to find the right row or rows in the child table and all the columns you want are in the child...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
July 14, 2008 at 6:31 am
If a PK looks like this:
Col1
,Col2
,Col3
Then in order to reference that as a foreign key, the code would look something like this:
ALTER TABLE [schema].[tablename]
CONSTRAINT [MyFKName] FOREIGN KEY
(Col1
,Col2
,Col3)
REFERENCES [schema].[parenttable]
(Col1
,Col2
,Col3)
The names of...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
July 14, 2008 at 6:25 am
From the sounds of things, you should also check some of the basic operations in the code like access order and/or join order. You need to make sure that the...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
July 14, 2008 at 6:19 am
If I do the entire design from scratch, how much of the fee do I get?
Seriously though. We're here because we enjoy the technical challenges and each others company. Ask...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
July 14, 2008 at 5:23 am
Depending on what kind of data you're trying to get back, yeah. Generally I've seen either a derived table or a correlated sub-query within the ON clause work extremely well...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
July 14, 2008 at 5:17 am
Yeah, if you want to equate data set or result set with derived table, then they're the same. Generally though, most people refer to a derived table as a subquery...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
July 14, 2008 at 5:13 am
According to Itzik Ben-Gan, a subquery is any of the scalar, multivalued or table expression queries written into an outer queries. He then goes on to refer to the scalar...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
July 11, 2008 at 11:49 am
He means it sounds like homework.
I'd suggest using a subqery with a TOP and ORDER BY.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
July 11, 2008 at 10:46 am
If you're trying add these values to a CTE, wouldn't you use UNION? Probably in a second CTE.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
July 11, 2008 at 10:44 am
There was absolute agreement on the OUTER JOIN being an issue. The question was, did placing filters on the INNER JOIN make a difference? Several people anecdotally believe(d) so (myself...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
July 11, 2008 at 9:45 am
Viewing 15 posts - 19,981 through 19,995 (of 22,224 total)