Viewing 15 posts - 19,891 through 19,905 (of 22,202 total)
There's no way to pass a where clause and get an estimated row count that I'm aware of.
That said, if you get an estimated execution plan, you'll get an...
July 23, 2008 at 6:20 am
Can you show the column names too? We need to understand where Tidspunkt is coming from.
July 23, 2008 at 6:17 am
Just a guess, you're running against a SQL Server 2000 instance. This is the 2005 forum and the solution offered was one that works there.
July 23, 2008 at 6:14 am
If I understand the question, you mean that you have a proc, Y. Within that proc it makes a call to another proc X. Within the proc X you're attempting...
July 23, 2008 at 6:13 am
Nice article, Tom. Thanks for sharing that solution. I'm passing it on to our OpsMgr admin to see if he can use it.
July 23, 2008 at 5:55 am
Just the System Monitor counters is all I've ever had available. I use Operations Manager to collect those now, but you could just use Performance Monitor.
July 23, 2008 at 5:24 am
SSIS does do a great job. You can also run the script manually and output the results to a file through Management Studio. You can also use sqlcmd.exe to run...
July 22, 2008 at 12:02 pm
But that assumes you're not worrying about extended character sets. Wouldn't that muck with international data?
July 22, 2008 at 11:53 am
CHAR or VARCHAR is one half the size of NCHAR or NVARCHAR.
The N designates the data type as unicode which stores at twice as much data for each character.
July 22, 2008 at 11:53 am
Use good indexes, especially the clustered index. Look into partitioned tables where appropriate. Use partitioned views where appropriate. Only denormalize where you can guarantee a tested performance benefit. Test everything...
July 22, 2008 at 8:43 am
OK. Well, that was useless.
Hmmm... If we were comparing reads of 10000 rows of VARCHAR to NVARCHAR, I wouldn't be surprised by a two-fold increase in speed. I'm a little...
July 22, 2008 at 8:37 am
Oh, I've got one of those for the dog... it'll work.
July 22, 2008 at 6:24 am
I'd be more interesting in seeing the execution plan from the query.
July 22, 2008 at 6:23 am
Thanks. Great description of automatic statistic maintenance, although it's for SQL Server 2000. Here's the BOL entry for 2005. There are a few differences, but nothing major.
I guess I wasn't...
July 22, 2008 at 6:19 am
July 22, 2008 at 6:00 am
Viewing 15 posts - 19,891 through 19,905 (of 22,202 total)