Viewing 15 posts - 17,986 through 18,000 (of 22,202 total)
Sounds like you have the Resource Governor in place. I'm not that familiar with it, but I would suspect there would be some way to set this query to not...
March 16, 2009 at 7:44 pm
Well done and congratulations. Deliver on half the list and you've earned your raise for the year (and you have an agenda for next year).
March 16, 2009 at 7:37 pm
I have not personally done an upgrade in that fashion. Based on my understanding of how it works, yes, but that's from reading documentation. If you want to be absolutely...
March 16, 2009 at 12:37 pm
That's a huge topic. First, you need to figure out what is causing the performance to slow down. Since, at this point, you're completely in the dark, I'd suggest taking...
March 16, 2009 at 9:31 am
Jack Corbett (3/16/2009)
March 16, 2009 at 8:16 am
That's a huge topic. First, you need to figure out what is causing the performance to slow down. Since, at this point, you're completely in the dark, I'd suggest taking...
March 16, 2009 at 8:12 am
Do you mean in terms of licensing or in terms of physically can it be done? If the latter, yeah. You're talking Standard edition to Standard Edition. It shouldn't be...
March 16, 2009 at 6:24 am
The query was resolved through auto-parameterization because it was a trivial plan. A trivial plan is not kept in cache because there is almost no generation cost for them. That's...
March 16, 2009 at 6:19 am
Is BlogEntry by chance a view? Does the underlying table have a different datatype than what you have presented here?
March 16, 2009 at 6:15 am
I worked somewhere similar, everyone in the company had 'sa' privs on production. Made for a few entertaining late night phone calls followed by some serious screaming matches the next...
March 16, 2009 at 6:13 am
The issue is that you have either table or column collation settings on the first set of data are different than on the second set. You'll need to look at...
March 16, 2009 at 6:07 am
Only if you can't reapply them. It's fairly common practice for really large scale data moves to remove indexes and foreign keys at the beginning of the move and then...
March 16, 2009 at 6:01 am
moojjoo (3/14/2009)
March 14, 2009 at 10:17 am
Since it's not executing, can you post the estimated execution plan?
It sounds like you might be getting some blocking. Are there other processes hitting the table at the same time?
March 14, 2009 at 5:37 am
Amit Lohia (3/13/2009)
I do not think it will make much difference but my testing is on platform 64
I think that's worth noting. Now we know it happens on two platforms....
March 13, 2009 at 11:00 am
Viewing 15 posts - 17,986 through 18,000 (of 22,202 total)