Viewing 15 posts - 17,806 through 17,820 (of 22,202 total)
That is strange behavior. I've never seen anything like it. If you can, post the code. If it's huge, post it as an attachment.
Do you have lots of PRINT statements...
April 3, 2009 at 6:06 am
Perry Whittle (4/2/2009)
April 3, 2009 at 6:04 am
I'm not sure, I haven't used this myself, and I don't see anything in the documentation. One point, Books Online suggests using the dynamic management function sys.dm_io_virtual_file_stats instead of...
April 2, 2009 at 6:25 am
Yeah, I've read those. I was never completely dependent on IO, but it sure made me second guess even how much I used it.
But Gail was write to call me...
April 2, 2009 at 6:09 am
I've never tried achieving that kind of measure before. But, I will say that you shouldn't be surprised if there are lots of reads even on a system that you...
April 2, 2009 at 6:02 am
I think he's referring to the statistics being out of date or insufficiently sampled. Just because you have auto-stats turned on doesn't mean that all the statistics are getting updated...
April 2, 2009 at 5:48 am
GilaMonster (4/2/2009)
Grant Fritchey (3/27/2009)
April 2, 2009 at 5:38 am
Yeah, Barry's right, table variables aren't logged, but what is it that you're doing that's causing so much logging?
April 1, 2009 at 7:34 pm
I think Gail has it right. They "fixed" the incorrect behavior from 2000. That leads to problems like what you encountered.
April 1, 2009 at 8:14 am
I don't see it on her blog[/url]. It was in a presentation she gave at the PASS Summit last November.
April 1, 2009 at 8:03 am
plavec (4/1/2009)
Tx for your help. We changed model and solved problem.But still I'd like to know if somebody knows how to makes compensation for FORCESEEK in 2005 or 2000.
Nice to...
April 1, 2009 at 7:57 am
Maybe I'm wrong. Wouldn't be the first time (today). Hang on, testing... might be a while.
April 1, 2009 at 7:47 am
Regardless of default schema, if you don't reference the schema in the query, SQL Server will try to find the query in dbo. I don't think it's a bug. It's...
April 1, 2009 at 7:19 am
It doesn't look like it from the code you showed, but are you using qualified names in the queries?
SELECT *
FROM schema.table
--not
SELECT *
FROM table
That would absolutely explain the problem.
April 1, 2009 at 6:11 am
According to the Upgrade Advisor column aliases in the ORDER BY clause cannot be prefixed by the table alias.
Why not try dropping the alias and then using the column name...
April 1, 2009 at 6:07 am
Viewing 15 posts - 17,806 through 17,820 (of 22,202 total)