Viewing 15 posts - 17,641 through 17,655 (of 22,202 total)
It sure sounds like blocking, but since you say it's not, I'd step back a bit, not look at that procedure directly and instead examine the waits and queues on...
April 21, 2009 at 8:48 am
GilaMonster (4/21/2009)
mithun.gite (4/21/2009)
GilaMonster (4/21/2009)
mithun.gite (4/21/2009)
Can any one give me a link for Query Optimization, using that i can start optimizing my queries?
I can suggest some books.
Inside SQL Server 2005: Query...
April 21, 2009 at 8:45 am
I would have to see the code to fully understand the issue. However, no, there's no way to selectively limit the query defined within a view. The query is going...
April 21, 2009 at 8:41 am
That's tough.
Without rearchitecting... I'd suggest setting up server side traces and capture query performance behavior. Then, go after the top poor performers. I'd focus on establishing a good set of...
April 21, 2009 at 8:32 am
You basically need a baseline to compare against. I'd suggest collecting the information when there are very few users on the system and then when there are lots of users....
April 21, 2009 at 8:29 am
The one thing no one seems to have mentioned is the selectivity of the data. Just because there are 10 columns and just because each of the 10 is used...
April 21, 2009 at 8:18 am
I wouldn't recommend using this method in the WHERE or JOIN clauses of your queries, but for the SELECT list, instead of CASE statements, try this:
SELECT COALESCE(MyColumn,'') AS MyColumn
...
That will...
April 21, 2009 at 6:24 am
You can also run it from Profier (Tools - Database Engine tuning Advisor) or from a SSMS query window (Query - Analyze Query in Database Enging Tuning Advisor).
April 20, 2009 at 11:49 am
I agree with GSquared. Capture the query info and make decisions from there. The one other thing that you might concern yourself with is the volatility of the data in...
April 20, 2009 at 11:45 am
GilaMonster (4/20/2009)
Jack Corbett (4/20/2009)
April 20, 2009 at 11:00 am
Jack Corbett (4/20/2009)
Bob Hovious (4/20/2009)
Although I have no preference, aren't they using VB with SSIS?
In 2005 yes, but in 2008 you can use C# as well. My current work...
April 20, 2009 at 7:11 am
SQL Server is heavily involved on managing parallelism. It has to to merge the data from the various streams so, it does quite a lot of work.
April 20, 2009 at 7:03 am
Krishna Potlakayala (4/18/2009)
fayilt (4/18/2009)
April 20, 2009 at 6:34 am
Yes, you can follow the link provided above and download the book for free. It's also available in a dead-tree version from Amazon if you prefer reading from paper.
Also, you...
April 20, 2009 at 6:31 am
Parallelism is an expensive process because of all the management that SQL Server has to do. So, you only want it to run on queries that are running long already...
April 20, 2009 at 6:26 am
Viewing 15 posts - 17,641 through 17,655 (of 22,202 total)