Viewing 15 posts - 49,351 through 49,365 (of 49,566 total)
Specify the table for all the columns. I didn't know what your tables looked like, so I too a guess. My bad.
SELECT TOP 20
October 27, 2005 at 5:18 am
What's with all the declared but unused variables?
You've got an error handling block, but no error checking anywhere.
October 27, 2005 at 4:16 am
Doesn't matter how you capture the data. You've got 15 fields all storing the same thing in one table. That's bad db design. It may make the capturing easier, but...
October 27, 2005 at 2:43 am
A subselect in the SELECt clause can only return 1 field. Join it is as a subquery.
Do you want the latest reply for a post? (assuming so for the below...
October 27, 2005 at 2:34 am
Can you fix the database design? At the moment it's violating first normal form (table contains repeating groups). What happens if it's decided that a month of data needs to...
October 27, 2005 at 2:13 am
I just glanced over it quickly, but I've got a feeling that it can be optimised a bit.
Can you please post table definitions, sample data and expected output. Also the...
October 26, 2005 at 1:18 am
No problem. What part don't you understand?
The case statement takes the day of the week (Sunday=1, Monday=2,....) and based on that decides how many days to add to get 7...
October 24, 2005 at 12:26 am
Not particuarly elegent, but it works.
set datefirst 7
DECLARE @DayOfWeek TINYINT
SET @DayOfWeek=datepart(dw,getdate())
select DATEADD(dd,CASE WHEN @DayOfWeek<5 THEN 9 WHEN @DayOfWeek=7 THEN 10 ELSE 11 END, GETDATE())
For today (Thurs 20th Oct) this returns...
October 20, 2005 at 12:46 am
No. Stored procedures may have output parameters but functions may not. See the following from BoL.
A user-defined function takes zero or more input parameters and returns either a scalar value...
October 19, 2005 at 1:03 am
A job that runs once a day would work.
Job checks for all records where datediff(dd,TraceDate,GETDATE())=7 AND TRStatus='Closed' The =7 ensures that the same record won't get flagged two days...
October 19, 2005 at 12:53 am
No problem.
I can't see anything wrong either. If you replace the sp_executeSQL with Print, what's the resulting statement? (checking to see that nothing strange has snuck into the variables)
October 18, 2005 at 6:41 am
That would be true, if there wasn't a TOP 1 in each of the subqueries.
The final order of the union is undefined, but it consists of the first records in...
October 18, 2005 at 4:47 am
This however does work
select Col1, Col2 FROM
(select top 1 Col1, Col2 from TableA order by Col2) a
UNION
select Col3, Col4 FROM
(select top 1 Col3, Col4 from TableB order by Col4) b
October 18, 2005 at 4:06 am
How many processors does your server have?
What connection settings/SET options is the app using?
October 18, 2005 at 2:12 am
At first glance (no coffee yet) I'd guess it has something to do with the fact that you have two tables with the same alias. You have both SupplierItemAttributeValue sv...
October 18, 2005 at 12:33 am
Viewing 15 posts - 49,351 through 49,365 (of 49,566 total)