Viewing 15 posts - 4,276 through 4,290 (of 4,745 total)
then we are back to the old appending backups rather than overwriting?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
July 21, 2008 at 7:09 am
richrock (7/21/2008)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
July 21, 2008 at 6:49 am
Johannsky (7/20/2008)
I am actively monitoring the logs if there are errors but all jobs are executed successfully.
3 days has passed, the .trn grows to 23Gb but non...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
July 21, 2008 at 3:40 am
rinu philip (7/20/2008)
Processed 85000 pages for database 'DB', file 'DB_Data' on file 1.
Processed 15272 pages for database 'DB', file 'DB_Index'...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
July 20, 2008 at 5:06 am
you may be running out of memory because of whatever else is running on the server. Look at lastwaittype in sysprocesses, if you see a lot or resource_semaphore waittypes this...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
July 20, 2008 at 4:45 am
this is in the 2005 forum but you stated you are using sql 2000, in that cases you cannot use schemas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
July 20, 2008 at 4:34 am
...or in the job history or in the logshipping tables in msdb.
is the target database now in standby/read only mode?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
July 19, 2008 at 1:41 pm
IThere is no database setting that will prevent loss of permissions if a stored proc is dropped and re-created. maybe its some setting in their app that changes the drop\re-create...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
July 19, 2008 at 12:31 pm
it would be, but unless you really need the space back, don't bother, you will fragment you log file at the OS level.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
July 18, 2008 at 3:52 pm
exactly, i don't think a security group should get involved at this level of detail, just satisfy themselves protection of data has been taken into account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
July 18, 2008 at 3:41 pm
a security group might define what various parts of the business should be able to do, bur the DBA should work out how these will be enforced within SQL and...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
July 18, 2008 at 2:12 pm
aliciakw (7/16/2008)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
July 16, 2008 at 8:23 am
also, read this article:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/maintain/logship1.mspx
---------------------------------------------------------------------
July 16, 2008 at 5:35 am
unless you are planning to regularily fail over then it is not necessary to check the box.
to make secondary the live database:
bringing secondary database online
either
restore database dbname with recovery
or...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
July 16, 2008 at 5:33 am
ravirayakulkarni (7/16/2008)
if i dont do that then how can thesecondary server take over the job of primary server
see my earlier post on how to bring it online. If the...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
July 16, 2008 at 5:19 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,276 through 4,290 (of 4,745 total)