Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,051 through 4,065 (of 4,745 total)

  • RE: Redgate Backup Of "System" databases

    I think MS never intended people to put stuff in there that would require a log backup. CAn't think of an explicit reason why log backups banned though other than...

  • RE: Redgate Backup Of "System" databases

    Jeff, you cannot do a log backup of master even if you have set it to full recovery mode (why do you need that for master?)

    I tried it via native...

  • RE: Restore with Recovery option

    with recovery is the default, so you do not need to explicitly include it.

    To restore to a new name :

    restore database newname from disk = 'backup file old database'

    with...

  • RE: strange dbcc checkdb error

    cs (12/15/2008)


    Might be worthwhile logging a call to the company... how they managed to get an index on that column is a bit beyond me 🙂

    ok, I did a select...

  • RE: strange dbcc checkdb error

    sounds very possible, in which case it would be a column likely to be searched on, and therefore worthy of an index

  • RE: strange dbcc checkdb error

    cs (12/15/2008)


    One more question:

    What happens if you run:

    select (100000000000000000000000000000000 * convert(numeric(6),(convert(int,((convert(numeric(7,2),[ObservanceTime],126) - 35000.00) * 100.0)) % 1000000)) + 1000000000000000000000000.0 * ([SourceID] % 100000000) + 10000000000000000.0 * ([TargetID] % 100000000) +...

  • RE: strange dbcc checkdb error

    ta.bu.shi.da.yu (12/15/2008)


    Cool...

    I'm curious, how does that checksum work?

    right now I've no idea what that column is used for, its a bought in app used for security monitoring rather...

  • RE: strange dbcc checkdb error

    it definitely is the index that upsets dbcc. I am able to retrieve data to usiing that index (according to query plan)

    unfortunately being SLQ 2000 hard to prove if index...

  • RE: strange dbcc checkdb error

    sorry Paul , it don't like numeric_roundabort set on -

    'DBCC failed because the following SET options have incorrect settings: 'NUMERIC_ROUNDABORT'.

  • RE: strange dbcc checkdb error

    I'll give it a whirl Paul.

  • RE: strange dbcc checkdb error

    Paul, succesfully read whole of table without errors, so I'm going to call it quits and enjoy whats left of my sunday (its 7:30 here).

    I'm satisfied data is ok...

  • RE: strange dbcc checkdb error

    cheers paul, I'll give it a try but table has 2.6 million rows so may be a while..........

  • RE: strange dbcc checkdb error

    set ANSI_PADDING,ANSI_WARNINGS,CONCAT_NULL_YIELDS_NULL,QUOTED_IDENTIFIER,ANSI_NULLS on

    GO

    set NUMERIC_ROUNDABORT,ARITHABORT off

    GO

    dbcc checktable(observances,3)

    gives

    DBCC failed because the following SET options have incorrect settings: 'ARITHABORT'.

    set arithabort on (so the exact settings used when index created)

    and I get:

    Arithmetic...

  • RE: strange dbcc checkdb error

    according to MSDN

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa933138(SQL.80).aspx

    SET options were correct for creating index on a computed column, but I cannot get dbcc to run on this index with quoted_identifier set on or off and...

  • RE: strange dbcc checkdb error

    thanks for replying Paul. Are you saying quoted_identifier incorrectly set when index created? Because checkdb fails whether it is on or off when checkdb runs

Viewing 15 posts - 4,051 through 4,065 (of 4,745 total)