Viewing 15 posts - 2,941 through 2,955 (of 4,745 total)
GilaMonster (2/9/2010)
mehmetburak.akkus-832492 (2/9/2010)
hi guys 🙂is there a full description or a white paper for this command ?
Um.... Take a look at the comments on the first page, take a look...
February 9, 2010 at 9:01 am
I have just come back from an interview where the interviewer asked me about DBCC timewarp and wanted me to describe the full syntax of all 137 required parameters (he...
February 9, 2010 at 7:07 am
presuming this is SQL2000....
under tools-wizards you have the index tuning wizard, create a standard profiler trace of normal activity on your server and run it through the wizard see what...
February 9, 2010 at 6:53 am
Krishna Potlakayala (2/8/2010)
george sibbald (2/6/2010)
February 9, 2010 at 5:50 am
As far as I am aware SSMS is not cluster aware and you have to do a separate install of the workstation components on the second node.
you don't need to...
February 8, 2010 at 2:56 pm
Also, in full production mode EEI-for-SPC produces so many dmp files in so many different space-time continuums that it requires 3 Oracle DBAs concentrating on it full time.
DBCC Timewarp can...
February 8, 2010 at 2:42 pm
John, thats just perapatetic exogmatism.
At least SQL server is fully heterogenous with Oracles electro-encephalagraphic interface for SPC ( a cost extra I might add) simply by using the -T666 flag.
February 8, 2010 at 2:20 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (2/8/2010)
nigel. (2/8/2010)
george sibbald (2/8/2010)
Its possible if you have some of its poo.
Oh yeah, plenty of s*** round here :-). Gotta make sure I use the right sample, or...
February 8, 2010 at 9:52 am
thanks for the clarification.
to my mind MS should have gone the whole hog and called 2008 R2 SQL 2010, would have been more consistent with past practices.
I understand the various...
February 8, 2010 at 9:09 am
nigel. (2/8/2010)
My hamster just fell through a distortion in the space-time continuum. Is it possible to get him back using DBCC TIMEWARP. Please help, he was my best friend.
Its possible...
February 8, 2010 at 8:51 am
Steve Jones - Editor (2/8/2010)
February 8, 2010 at 8:46 am
GilaMonster (2/8/2010)
george sibbald (2/8/2010)
at least we now know why it was called R2 and not just released as SP2!
Because it's not a service pack. It's a set of add-ons for...
February 8, 2010 at 7:57 am
at least we now know why it was called R2 and not just released as SP2!
February 8, 2010 at 7:50 am
perhaps dbid > 4 as well to omit the system databases?
February 8, 2010 at 7:39 am
Viewing 15 posts - 2,941 through 2,955 (of 4,745 total)