Viewing 15 posts - 1,276 through 1,290 (of 2,694 total)
you changed something on your script as the output you had given before meant the script supplied by Scott worked.
you may have dropped 1 column from the table definition (or...
February 16, 2021 at 1:38 pm
stored procs is the easiest and fastest to implement for a small scale like that.
restore prod db to another instance (protected), run data desensitization process, backup and make backup available...
February 16, 2021 at 1:19 pm
WHAT!!!!!!
Non Prod SHOULD NOT have PII information.
Get your processes changed so dev gets a version of the prod database that has gone through a process of removing PII information from...
February 16, 2021 at 8:37 am
changing part of Scott's code should work.
SELECT @sql = STUFF((
SELECT ', ' + 'MOVE ''' + LogicalName + ''' TO '''
...
February 16, 2021 at 12:25 am
DDM is NOT a good choice for anything - for ad-hoc users its not like they can unmask it but they can infer the data and after multiple attempts they...
February 15, 2021 at 6:26 pm
as a important note get ride of those with(nolock). if your business is ok with possibility of having bad data supplied to them you can add a single statement at...
February 13, 2021 at 6:53 pm
Social Security numbers are considered PII and are a attribute of an individual/company and should be stored securely and are for this reason a bad choice for PK - other...
February 12, 2021 at 7:45 pm
the following code will work - .mdf file CAN NOT be opened by SQL Server when it is done as SQL will exclusively lock the file.
as everyone said this is...
February 12, 2021 at 5:25 pm
Thanks @frederico, but wouldn't the data pages keep on changing every time we run index reorg or index rebuild?
yes - but by giving them those pages on a file...
February 11, 2021 at 10:25 pm
you can - but it would be completely useless for any intents and purposes. small c# program open file binary, read first 25 pages (25*8k bytes) and do same for...
February 11, 2021 at 7:00 pm
not wishing to minimize the article itself which I consider well written I wonder why would posting this on a SQL Server forum be a good idea.
February 9, 2021 at 2:53 pm
No issues from a compatibility point of view for having both running on same box - obviously resource sharing is where one may impact the other but if both are...
February 2, 2021 at 6:49 pm
not sure if it was just a typo but the example supplied is only adding a single quote to the item on the middle - so clarification on the requirements...
February 1, 2021 at 10:57 pm
lots of things can cause that - but without table definitions (including indexes and FK's), row counts for each table, view definition as well as any function used within those...
January 31, 2021 at 9:03 pm
LastName INCLUDE (ProductID, FirstName) and LastName INCLUDE (FirstName) are the same in this case as ProductID is the clustered index "key".
regarding your indexes I misread your original post.
LastName, DateDeleted INCLUDE(FirstName)WHERE...
January 29, 2021 at 12:06 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1,276 through 1,290 (of 2,694 total)