Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,451 through 3,465 (of 6,035 total)

  • RE: The Problem Solver

    Andrew_Steitz (9/4/2015)


    Ed Wagner (9/3/2015)


    Jeff Moden (9/3/2015)


    When I was the Director of MIS for a small but nationwide telephone company, someone asked me about my habit of hiring nearly over zealous...

  • RE: Can't release space of temdb

    If this is a reporting database with stored procedures that typically run for several minutes or longer, then one thing I do to audit usage and performance is implement something...

  • RE: Cannot log in as 'sa' after a password update

    To decode the actual reason the login failed, you'll have to look in error log (not client message) for the State code.

    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sql_protocols/archive/2006/02/21/536201.aspx

    Note that the message is kept fairly nondescript to...

  • RE: The Case for Upgrading

    xinternet (9/3/2015)


    SQL2005 is EOF April 2016. It's on Extended Support. So not accurate to say "... old, unsupported ..."

    https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle?c2=1044

    For a TB+ sized data warehouse there is more of...

  • RE: The Case for Upgrading

    Andrew..Peterson (9/3/2015)


    If you have an old truck that still does the job, you don't buy a new one just because it is new. Upgrades are a cost benefit decision. Microsoft...

  • RE: Upgraded from 2008 to 2014, queries slowed to a crawl

    bwhiteside (9/3/2015)


    Grant, I think you called it. It looks like the new cardinality estimator appears to be causing our queries to run much slower. We changed the compatibility mode to...

  • RE: Byte Me: Bad Code

    jckfla (9/3/2015)


    Eric M Russell (9/2/2015)


    Psst! Hey Buddy! You wanna buy some source code?

    Yuck, who let a sales repsentative for Red Hat wander into the data center? 😀

    Oh dear...I feel...

  • RE: The Case for Upgrading

    Alvin Ramard (9/3/2015)


    Eric M Russell (9/3/2015)


    Years ago I was involved in a SQL Server 2000 -> 2005 migration. There was a 3rd party hardware interface application that would not connect...

  • RE: No More Foreign Keys?

    ccd3000 (9/3/2015)


    I suppose you could argue the cost is in complexity and rigidity. Depending on the scenario that can be a good thing (you need structured, efficient data). I think...

  • RE: The Case for Upgrading

    Years ago I was involved in a SQL Server 2000 -> 2005 migration. There was a 3rd party hardware interface application that would not connect to SQL Server 2005. From...

  • RE: No More Foreign Keys?

    The purpose of foreign keys are understood by all here.

    But, aside from it's impact on bulk load performance (typically not an issue for OLTP databases), can someone recap what...

  • RE: The Case for Upgrading

    Just curious what type of code changes would be needed for a MS Access application originally designed for SQL Server 2005 to support SQL Server 2014 ?

    Of course the connection...

  • RE: No More Foreign Keys?

    RonKyle (9/2/2015)


    We all just need to come to terms with the fact that application programmers have a need to locally persist things like shopping carts, messaging, or just generic objects....

  • RE: No More Foreign Keys?

    We all just need to come to terms with the fact that application programmers have a need to locally persist things like shopping carts, messaging, or just generic objects. It...

  • RE: No More Foreign Keys?

    I've seen cases when someone was attempt to use the Import Wizzard to load a table and accidentally checked the option 'Delete Existing' instead of 'Append', or where a miscoded...

Viewing 15 posts - 3,451 through 3,465 (of 6,035 total)