Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Thanks! - that makes sense. I will definitely file it for future development/data migration that is on the horizon.
The other way around this (speaking to the original application programmer)...
November 22, 2014 at 7:38 am
#1760328
thanks, that is the top level answer, but that doesn't explain why changing the underlying SQL data type from nvarchar(max) (which was overkill for a 2-character field)
to text, or nvarchar(50)...
November 21, 2014 at 8:53 am
#1760190