I am a bit confused, the regex you say you want to get to, ie

^: ([0-9]{9}): *([0-9]+)

will match any number combination

or are you...

..overall the performance should be better...

Yes I was thinking of adding another post to indicate that what I...

SELECT a.AccountNumber,a.InvoiceNumber,a.InvoiceDate,a.RowID

FROM [InvoiceTable] a

WHERE a.RowID IN (SELECT TOP 2 b.RowID

    FROM [InvoiceTable] b

    WHERE b.AccountNumber = a.AccountNumber

    ORDER BY b.RowID DESC)

I would move

And actualClub.Type = 0

to the LEFT JOIN, ie

LEFT JOIN Club actualClub ON actualClub.Id = s.ClubId AND actualClub.Type=0

déjà vu

I gave details of problem like this in another post

http://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/shwmessage.aspx?forumid=9&messageid=360507#bm360559

If this is a one off then you would be better...

declare @ProjectCode char(20)

you have declared this as char and sql will add trailing spaces to values less than 20 char in length

set @ProjectCode='1110201BA'

will have trailing spaces (see...

CASE is neither a 'statement' nor an 'expression' it is a function, it just happens to take expressions for input and produces an expression for output.

I tested the logic of the code you posted and could not replicate your problem, the INSERT command was always executed, so I still stand by my original post.

I would...

Maybe this

SELECT a.c As [ThisRow],

(SELECT MIN(b.c) FROM b WHERE b.c > a.c) As [NextRow]

FROM a

NUL chars will cause errors in DTS when you try to configure Text File. NUL is not settable as a delimiter and it will terminate reads as well.

Your only option...

Looks OK to me

The trigger will fire for any INSERT/UPDATE regardless of DDT_DOCU_PRINT_TEXT update or not

The IF UPDATE test restricts the update to only when DDT_DOCU_PRINT_TEXT is updated

Also remember that...

...what account SQL Server is running under...

In EM

Locate the server

Right click on the server

Select properties

Select the Security tab

 Startup...

And the 'summary' is taking forever to query...

If you are summarising 200 mil rows then it will take...

So what is 'taking forever to query'

The transfer of data from ServerA to ServerB?

Or the summary?

Why the transfer, is it possible to summarise the data on the server that holds...

Without a unique key you will not be able to select the data in chunks because there is no guarantee for the order of the data without an 'ORDER BY'...