Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
Many kudos to the author for:
a) posting the row size
b) posting the environment used
c) running equivalent tests
d) running the tests several times in a row
e) choosing a large enough data...
October 22, 2013 at 2:59 am
My two cents: Microsoft has a lot of conversions that happen throughout the year from Oracle to SQLServer. The transition for Oracle folks to get to SQLServer is made...
June 4, 2012 at 3:47 am
An interesting start, but the discussion doesn't go far enough. There needs to be a distinction: what is the target? Is the target OLTP systems? or is the...
October 25, 2010 at 4:31 am
I'm sorry if I wasn't clear enough. 400k rps is where SQLServer 2008 R2 should be going - it's not where it is today. 400k rps during...
February 1, 2010 at 3:33 am
Lots of good comments here, but I want to make a couple things clear: I work with systems ranging in size from 1 Terabyte to...
January 30, 2010 at 5:08 am
I understand what is desired. Please don't get me wrong: set based processing has been around for a long long time. What is important here is to...
November 23, 2009 at 4:34 pm
While I agree with your approach - the basic concepts are sound - I disagree with one thing: processing the data on the way in to the data warehouse. ...
November 23, 2009 at 3:35 am