Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,771 through 1,785 (of 2,640 total)

  • RE: Binary Index Question

    The short answer is try it, test it. If it works/helps good  if not forget it!!

    [font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
    www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
    http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/

  • RE: Binary Index Question

    I've sometimes made gains by making the bit column part of another index. I often encounter tables which have a column to designate current or active data. Every query always...

    [font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
    www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
    http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/

  • RE: Ownership Chaining

    and congrats on mvp. The database chaining caught a few of us out on sp4 where we had some common code within master - suddenly it stopped working!!!

    [font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
    www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
    http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/

  • RE: Installing named instance of sql 2005 on sql 2000

    ah no you can't change an instance to a default - you'd have to run another install.

    remove sql2k with remove programs.

    [font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
    www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
    http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/

  • RE: SQLAgent Memory Usage on SQL 2005

    sorry - yes implemented last three clients but not current, will check my own servers tonight.

    I'd think that if the agent service was running a batch of commands then...

    [font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
    www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
    http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/

  • RE: Seamless Replication with column drop and re-add

    Your approach should be based on how much data is ion the table:

    For a smallish table just take the table out of replication, make the changes, add it back and...

    [font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
    www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
    http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/

  • RE: Installing named instance of sql 2005 on sql 2000

    sql2k and sql2005 can exist quite happily side by side, they install as seperate installs and can be instances if you wish. One is never an instance of the other,...

    [font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
    www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
    http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/

  • RE: Windows License YIKES

    sorry I was going to add, you have to license the o/s that sql server runs on, you always have, it's never come free, ever. I don't see what the...

    [font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
    www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
    http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/

  • RE: Windows License YIKES

    It's normally easiest to license by processor, then you don't need cals. You can't cal an internet app, that's what proc licenses are for.

    sounds to me like you're all...

    [font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
    www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
    http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/

  • RE: SQLAgent Memory Usage on SQL 2005

    sounds unrelated to me although the agent memory seems a tad high. How are you measuring this value?

    [font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
    www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
    http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/

  • RE: Challenge: check my cost figures; SQL Server 2x Oracle??

    yup you're mixing cals and procs, note that you don't really gain much by putting sql std on ent w2k3 unless you're 64bit or running a non dedicated sql server.

    I'm...

    [font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
    www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
    http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/

  • RE: Invalid Descriptor Index. The step failed.

    been there done that, that's why I've finally posted. I'm pretty sure it's down to group policy but like most things you have to be able to prove it. Most...

    [font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
    www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
    http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/

  • RE: Avoid Blocking!!

    sorry - wrong key!!

    • Triggers - guaranteed to cause problems
    • Dynamic sql
    • embedded sql
    • implicit transactions poorly formed
    • temp tables within transactions
    • stored proc recompilation - procs starting sp_
    • linked sevrer queries
    • cross database queries
    • insufficient server resource -...

    [font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
    www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
    http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/

  • RE: Avoid Blocking!!

    readers block writers and slow system makes transactions slower thus increasing blocking.

    Quick fix = add more memory as this will cache more data thus making transactions quicker ( reduces disk...

    [font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
    www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
    http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/

  • RE: Avoid Blocking!!

    readers block writers and slow system makes transactions slower thus increasing blocking.

    Quick fix = add more memory as this will cache more data thus making transactions quicker ( reduces disk...

    [font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
    www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
    http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/

Viewing 15 posts - 1,771 through 1,785 (of 2,640 total)