Viewing 15 posts - 1,756 through 1,770 (of 2,640 total)
There's not enough data in northwind as it is to properly test this and you must test this like the author suggested using multiple ( optional ) parameters - testing...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
October 10, 2006 at 1:22 am
Instant RBAR ????? ( sorry it's monday morning! )
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
October 9, 2006 at 3:30 am
Yup totally agree - I'm far more productive and far better able to think out of the box if I have colleagues ( team ) to work with. I have...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
October 9, 2006 at 3:27 am
I experimented with this many years ago, if tables are small the benefits are good but on anything else the performance is apalling in terms of i/o and data cache flush....
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
October 9, 2006 at 3:17 am
I must admit I struggled to understand the o/s licensing requirements. As Richard points out, in a ms environment you would already have cals for your users - most companies...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
October 6, 2006 at 9:33 am
The memory limit for 32bit ent w3k3 ( R2) is now 64Gb. Despite that you're still limited by the sql version too. 64bit sql 2005 std can adress unlimited memory...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
October 6, 2006 at 1:29 am
I apologise for posting twice - must have been a stutter on my workstation - I still don't have a solution to this so if any readers have any thoughts...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
October 5, 2006 at 9:38 am
It's part of the sql 2005 install.
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
October 5, 2006 at 9:33 am
agreed - with peer to peer - assumed this was not the case otherwise the Q would not have been asked ^^
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
October 5, 2006 at 9:32 am
You should really read BOL on requirements and restrictions when using replication.
Essentially to alter a replicated table remove it from the publication, make changes , and add it back.
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
October 5, 2006 at 3:08 am
In a nutshell you're correct and the vendor is talking out of his/her *&%$£ , however, if you don't actually need transaction logs and you're not making transaction log backups...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
October 5, 2006 at 1:29 am
yup - that's what takes me back to my initial comment!!
I was fortunate to be able to take a 6.5 5 day training course on indexes way back, and follow...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
October 5, 2006 at 1:21 am
a word of warning concerning using a top without an order by? You might not actually get the result you expect.
I find there's often confusion between top and max (...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
October 5, 2006 at 1:12 am
If you don't need to use transactions or transaction log backups for recovery then switch the database to simple mode. You should find reducing the size of the log device...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
October 4, 2006 at 7:48 am
any regular shrinking ( or to the same effect growth ) will cause ntfs fragmentation which will degrade performance. Try to balance device size to allow minimal size changes.
Autoshrink should...
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
October 4, 2006 at 7:43 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,756 through 1,770 (of 2,640 total)