Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
Did everyone else realise that the original poster solved his own problem - it is the second post in the thread and I have only just noticed it!
Ryan,
If the code...
March 10, 2004 at 4:59 am
The problem isn't syntax - it is data related - if the following statement is false then the error will occur
IF (@vcCname != @in_vcCatname AND @dtExpiry != @in_dtExpdate)
I have...
March 9, 2004 at 3:55 pm
If a you have a SELECT statement within a transaction than produces an error the transaction is rolled back without any specific indication. You should however get the error message...
March 9, 2004 at 3:34 pm
I agree with other comments made about error in one of the sql statements within the transaction.
As I understand it if you get an error an implicit rollback takes place...
March 9, 2004 at 1:36 pm
All the testing I have ever done on this tells me that the lock will not be maintained unless it is within a transaction however I have not done too...
March 9, 2004 at 1:25 pm
If you wanted to use a pessimistic locking technique and apply a lock to a row at the time you select it then you would need to do it within...
March 8, 2004 at 6:25 am
Hi Jeff,
It is not a case of parameterising the view - I would simply use a where clause when selecting from the view.
Select * from vwMyView where Product ='widget'
Regards
John
March 4, 2004 at 11:14 am
March 3, 2004 at 1:31 pm
March 2, 2004 at 3:50 pm
Antares686. After further tests I can definately confirm your initial response (at least with respect to transactional replication). I am interested in the CommitBatchSize and CommitBatchThreshold arguments to the distribution...
October 2, 2002 at 1:59 pm
I am also investigating use of replication for a remote sales force. The tests I have done so far suggest the opposite to Antares686 statement. My test publication includes 2...
September 30, 2002 at 2:27 pm
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)