Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 819 total)
That's easy!
But, try to answer this:
"What's the resut?"
SELECT TRY_CONVERT(VARCHAR(1), {D'2011-MAY-01'})
:-D:-D:-D
February 18, 2016 at 2:06 am
Anyway -- the BOL quote explains it in technical implementation-related terms. The explanation given by Steve is the same but in more functional terms: the value is unknown, it could...
January 28, 2016 at 8:04 am
I disagree with explanation:
However NULLs are not restricted as the value could be less than 10
CHECK evaluates only true (accepted) or false (rejected) expression not UNKNOWN (accepted).
From BOL:
CHECK constraints reject...
January 28, 2016 at 2:52 am
I disagree with explanation, the error generated
Msg 4104, Level 16, State 1, Line 2
The multi-part identifier "o.object_id" could not be bound.
it's not caused by CROSS APPLY, but a reference...
January 13, 2016 at 3:16 am
bjh1977 (1/4/2016)
Small correction required - UDFs came in as part of 2000 didn't they?
I think they started earlier with stored procs ('90): sql 6.0
January 4, 2016 at 6:13 am
The "order by" clause misses!
Try this:
declare @image as table (
row_id tinyint
primary key clustered (row_id desc)
);
insert into @image(row_id)
values(1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9)
select
case
when max(i.row_id) over() - i.row_id >...
December 28, 2015 at 1:29 am
Ed Wagner (12/18/2015)
Carlo Romagnano (12/18/2015)
Msg 5074, Level 16, State 1, Line 17
The index 'IX_MySales_CustomerReport' is dependent...
December 18, 2015 at 6:08 am
In case of shortening or if the type is CHAR/NCHAR the following error is raised:
Msg 5074, Level 16, State 1, Line 17
The index 'IX_MySales_CustomerReport' is dependent on column 'OrderStatus'.
Msg 4922,...
December 18, 2015 at 1:19 am
Here's a method to move resource database:
http://www.sqlnotes.info/2012/01/06/new-way-to-relocate-resource-database/%5B/url%5D
I never tested it, but, it seems to work.
December 2, 2015 at 1:27 am
Koen Verbeeck (11/20/2015)
Learned something new. Thanks Steve!
That's true
🙂
November 20, 2015 at 1:06 am
patricklambin (11/18/2015)
I would advice to prohibit this way of coding/naming.
I disagree, naming conventions should reflect the factory needs. So, it may be that [Sales.XXX] is good in some environment.
November 18, 2015 at 1:38 am
If I want to be pedant, the right answer is "All of the above".
Because of lacking of batch separator "GO".
If you run the script no procedure is created.
November 4, 2015 at 3:59 am
Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 819 total)