Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 6,216 total)
I don't see anything wrong with reviews, as long as labeled as such.
June 28, 2007 at 8:34 am
Nothing wrong with that approach. If you're really curious, you could compare the time it takes to just dbcc indexdefrag vs the complete rebuild that happens when you add the...
June 28, 2007 at 7:47 am
Interesting. I've mostly used model 1 as referenced, and for small/medium operations it works just fine. I see a lot of value in a diff tool for change detection so...
June 28, 2007 at 7:27 am
For debugging, try running sqlagent from a command line instead of as a service. I think it has a -v switch that will dump all the output right to the...
June 28, 2007 at 7:13 am
Should have added that to the original post, my apologies. I like the sequentialid change, just not sure I'd bother with changing old data (which usually affects other things, but...
June 28, 2007 at 7:01 am
I think maybe a better title would have helped, it really does feel like a review. Nothing wrong with a review and in the course of that I'd expect someone...
June 28, 2007 at 6:53 am
I've always made it a practice to have the dbo set to SA, but for the most part it doesn't matter, as long as you're ok with whoever the owner...
June 28, 2007 at 6:50 am
Not sure I agree with what you're doing, but maybe this will help anyway! How about creating a temp table that has a new guid column that defaults to sequential...
June 27, 2007 at 11:09 am
I'd go with the second solution, with one change, adding a comment to indicate what the value of 1 means:
SELECT c.fname, c.lname, moc.value AS PHONE
June 27, 2007 at 7:16 am
You can also get it this way:
sp_dboption
dbname, 'published'
June 27, 2007 at 7:05 am
Could you add some background about why you're considering XML for the details? Might help us give you a better answer.
June 26, 2007 at 6:30 am
If you're going to let them create objects you should either make sure they create them as explicitly owned by dbo, or just make them the db_owner.
I don't disagree with...
June 26, 2007 at 6:21 am
I didnt know that about the block size. Is the error message helpful when it happens? Nothing wrong with suggestions:-)
June 25, 2007 at 9:19 am
Not sure about the error, but you might try this:
create
proc usp_AttachDBWithMissingLogFile @DBName sysname, @DBFileName nvarchar
June 25, 2007 at 9:17 am
Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 6,216 total)