Viewing 15 posts - 4,786 through 4,800 (of 6,216 total)
I have done it without a problem. When you define a publication in SQL2K there is an option to indicate if all the subscribers are SQL2K or not.
Andy
March 7, 2002 at 8:34 am
I think you might be referring to doing it in Query Analyzer,there you can right click anything and select "send to window" or "send to file". Faster than the copy/paste...
March 7, 2002 at 6:10 am
I don't think anything wrong with your code, sounds like you are off by one on the length of the "record". Are you accounting for a record delimiter of some...
March 7, 2002 at 6:06 am
I haven't tried it yet, know we have a project where we're considering something similar. Seems like it would be doable, use form fields in the template, then based on...
March 6, 2002 at 5:21 pm
Good point. The built in encryption in both Access and SQL so far has been weak, designed to make it harder to get to the data or the stored procedures,...
March 6, 2002 at 5:03 pm
I haven't tried this, but it looks promising:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/architec/8_ar_da_5mwe.asp
"Microsoft® SQL Server™ 2000 introduces the ability to programmatically associate up to 128 bytes of binary information with the current session or connection....
March 6, 2002 at 4:06 pm
SP_Change_users_login is what you're looking for - there are a couple of articles here on the site that discuss it. The ID's are mismatched between sysxlogins in master and sysusers...
March 6, 2002 at 3:58 pm
I guess one question would be are you testing on the same spid you're logging? Not using two different QA windows to test? Another is from your client app if...
March 6, 2002 at 2:32 pm
If its all or nothing you can use the datareader/datawriter roles. Other than that yes you'd have to do it one at a time, easy enough to do a loop...
March 6, 2002 at 9:23 am
Does the service account have disk permissions too? Try using RunAs (if you're on Win2K) to test the app separately.
Andy
March 6, 2002 at 9:22 am
Tom, I'd be interested to see your code, never hurts to see more than one solution. Written but untested (sorry, had removed the named instances I use for testing and...
March 6, 2002 at 6:13 am
Are you sure you're triggering changes that meet your criteria? I'd move the code from the trigger into a proc and set up a fake inserted table to test against....
March 6, 2002 at 6:11 am
If you know there will be a max of three then I dont think you need recursion, just self join to the table twice with a left join.
Andy
March 6, 2002 at 5:32 am
Dont you need a where clause on the first update?
Andy
March 6, 2002 at 5:30 am
I'd go with which ever one you have more experience with. If you're not experienced with either one yet then I think SQL2000 makes more sense. No idea about study...
March 5, 2002 at 9:18 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 4,786 through 4,800 (of 6,216 total)