Viewing 15 posts - 6,931 through 6,945 (of 7,498 total)
On our clustered instances, every once in a while the linked servers just give up ![]()
In our case that is not deadly because the...
July 30, 2004 at 12:16 am
could be something like this :
CREATE TRIGGER TrIU_T_Mytable ON dbo.Mytable
FOR INSERT, UPDATE
AS
IF MyEmailColumn is NOT null
begin
-- must be unique where not null
If exists (select * from dbo.Mytable...
July 29, 2004 at 8:17 am
maybe for performance reasons it is better to split up your queries ! ![]()
This effort must only be done once (and at maintenance time...
July 29, 2004 at 5:58 am
What 's happening if he copies the 65/76Mb files again from his backuplocation to another location (or renames them) at the db-server and then sp_attachdb them to a new db...
July 29, 2004 at 5:41 am
I just checked a couple of servers and we also run extra sp_updatestats every 4 months as well as dbcc updateusage because auto-stats get inaccurate after a while.
July 29, 2004 at 5:21 am
check out : The Curse and Blessings of Dynamic SQL ![]()
July 29, 2004 at 5:16 am
Thanks Razvan Socol ! That's what I was looking for ![]()
I'll take a look at the...
July 29, 2004 at 1:44 am
autoextend is indeed a slow process, but 1 - 2 hours
If you create a new db with a datafile of 700mb at...
July 29, 2004 at 12:21 am
Thanks for the feedback.
FYI : we have auto-update-statistics on all our sql7- and sql2k-db.
July 29, 2004 at 12:00 am
I know it's a basic rule, but I wanted to work out a litle case so I can show developers the effect. Not only within QA, but also within their...
July 28, 2004 at 11:57 pm
".. but the second one will return all rows in the table .."
No. Test it.
Left part contains only those with Associated?="No"
Right part contains only those with Associated?="yes"
joined by July 28, 2004 at 3:46 am
aaarch Wednesday morning syndorme
affected my query !
-- if all [account#] have rows...
July 28, 2004 at 2:34 am
"I am basically looking for all account #’s that have no systems associated to them"
SELECT [Account#]
From [System_Account_Association]
where [Associated?] ='NO'
group by [Account#] -- in stead of distinct because it...
July 28, 2004 at 1:52 am
You'll have to check with your developer(s) to see if they realy need all possible bytes.
Meybe they've worked out a combination so they don't exceed 8060 bytes in a...
July 28, 2004 at 12:54 am
In fact, that QOD pushed me to launch this thread. ![]()
We don't use CR, so I loose that argument.
July 27, 2004 at 11:49 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 6,931 through 6,945 (of 7,498 total)