Viewing 15 posts - 6,361 through 6,375 (of 7,467 total)
I've reinstalled my test-dekstop with winxp sp2, added sql2000 client (no sp) and then sql2005 client.
Everithing works fine.
SQL2005 client is being instaled with these options :
ADDLOCAL=Client_Components,Connectivity,SQL_Tools90
,SQL_WarehouseDevWorkbench,SDK,SQLXML,Tools_Legacy
,SQL_Documentation,SQL_BooksOnline,SQL_Samples
February 8, 2006 at 12:47 am
if this connection is to be used frequently , maybe enabling connection pooling is an option
control panel\data sources\connection pooling ....
This way your connection is kept alive (after the application...
February 7, 2006 at 8:01 am
So apparently the problem is related to the speed of building a connection or it might even be a connectionpooling problem.
February 7, 2006 at 7:26 am
Do you use a domain service account for sqlserver ?
0x80004005 is always an access problem
February 7, 2006 at 7:12 am
nice example
Here is another :
WITH
cteEmployeeOrderedByMyRowNumber AS
(SELECT ROW_NUMBER()
February 7, 2006 at 4:03 am
check your sqlagent properties/ jobsystem and raise the jobhistory lines.
afaik there is no way of stating that each job should retain at least the last month or n-days of execution...
February 7, 2006 at 3:02 am
What's DBCC CHECKDB stating ?
Also check out : http://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/shwmessage.aspx?forumid=5&messageid=197066
and http://www.portsense.com/ng/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/2004/March/22/314579.cfm
February 6, 2006 at 6:55 am
Just a wild shot :
What (type of) account is serving Scheduled Task ? Maybe it does not have the authority to access the batch or osql
February 6, 2006 at 5:57 am
the best thing you can do is to use query analyser and use the "predict execution plan" (ctrl+L) or "show execution plan" (ctrl+k) option to check out what it's doing.
February 6, 2006 at 5:14 am
- Any drivemapping involved ? use UNC in stead of drive-letters.
- capture your output
--> for the batch for osql use the -o parameter (check bol)
February 6, 2006 at 5:07 am
like always, it depends on the usage of your table.
400 columns/tb and normalized ? I'm in no position to judge but this seems...
February 6, 2006 at 5:03 am
For the moment I'm running both at my windows xp sp2 without a problem
I started with the sql2k-personal edition, then installed my 2005...
February 3, 2006 at 7:47 am
Thank you for the replies.
For the moment, none of the applications has a specific need for a non-default collation.
The only way we may get into troubles is with our DTS-packages...
February 3, 2006 at 7:13 am
Once devs are pushed toward using parameters, they get confused as to why their sp is not reused and has many compilations when in use.
The reason is most of the...
February 3, 2006 at 3:51 am
in sql2005 use the xml-datatype
I just took a look at the way biztalk handles it, and they are using a mix of ntext...
February 3, 2006 at 12:25 am
Viewing 15 posts - 6,361 through 6,375 (of 7,467 total)