Viewing 15 posts - 4,336 through 4,350 (of 7,496 total)
can you run sp_updatestistics and dbcc updateusage(0) with count_rows ?
This should get you fresh stats ...
November 6, 2008 at 1:32 pm
starting a SQLTrace will also help to determine the source of your deletes.
November 6, 2008 at 1:20 pm
bring on the caffeine.
We have a volume licensed Dev Edtn.
Also keep in mind, if you don't supply a key, it will install a Ent edtn for 140 days.
November 6, 2008 at 10:56 am
You can off course create a trigger for delete on that table to perform a rollback for delete statements and raise en error stating all connection info.
November 6, 2008 at 10:55 am
did you check out backup compression softwares ?
They typically reduce the size to +/- 20%
November 6, 2008 at 10:20 am
there is off course the undocumented :crazy: [sp_MSforeachtable].
Keep in mind the order of execution if you have DRI.
(or repeat more than once)
If you want to avoid log overhead, try to...
November 6, 2008 at 10:17 am
use an insert/update trigger to check the condition and rollback if invalid.
November 6, 2008 at 10:09 am
Before you start the restore to recover PIT, you should still backup the current log of the db !
After that, you can restore your previous full backup ( PIT,...
November 6, 2008 at 7:55 am
btw
did you check the plan using a @variable in stead of the hard coded
WHERE vh.VendorID = 14
Maybe vendorid 14 just generates a less optimal (non...
November 6, 2008 at 7:37 am
A trace file does not switch by day.
run
SELECT * FROM ::fn_trace_getinfo(default)
If you don't see an active trace, someone did disable the default trace for your instance.
There are...
November 6, 2008 at 6:34 am
did you check Kimberly's very good white paper on partitioning ?
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345146.aspx
BOL also has some info on sliding windows:
- "Transferring Data Efficiently by Using Partition Switching"
- "Designing Partitions to Manage Subsets...
November 5, 2008 at 1:04 pm
I would alter the distinct to a group by on all columns.
Group by may take advantage of existing indexes.
November 5, 2008 at 12:58 pm
seems to me like your data after exp is a date, so make it a datetime column !
pro:
- only date(time) values accepted
- the whole bunch of datetime related functions
con:
- no...
November 5, 2008 at 10:27 am
the original queries contained this where clause:
U.[user_id] = @original_user_id AND
U.[user_name] = @original_user_name AND
U.[user_surname] = @original_user_surname AND
...
November 5, 2008 at 5:17 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,336 through 4,350 (of 7,496 total)