Viewing 15 posts - 5,476 through 5,490 (of 7,484 total)
Revenant (9/9/2011)
bopeavy (9/9/2011)
FRIDAY!Beer(s)!
Wine(s)!
I'm sticking to wine this evening. No beer. Well, maybe a beer at home before I go out and head for the bar, just to celebrate the...
September 9, 2011 at 4:18 pm
GilaMonster (9/9/2011)
BEGIN TRANSACTION Tran1
INSERT INTO...
September 9, 2011 at 1:21 pm
Ninja's_RGR'us (9/9/2011)
Tom.Thomson (9/9/2011)
edit: I see I should have looked more carefully at the first item.Then what's your opinion on this?
That it doesn't show any buggy behaviour in 2008 R2(SP1).
But, on...
September 9, 2011 at 11:21 am
Ninja's_RGR'us (9/9/2011)
I think I found another one today. Please confirm this is an issue on your...
September 9, 2011 at 9:38 am
Ninja's_RGR'us (9/9/2011)
September 9, 2011 at 7:18 am
Ninja's_RGR'us (9/8/2011)
I'm not sure about my math on this but it would mean that you have roughly 26...
September 9, 2011 at 6:15 am
Gianluca Sartori (9/9/2011)
ALZDBA (9/8/2011)
This way they free up resources on the dwh server and run ETL at...
September 9, 2011 at 4:13 am
Paul, thanks for that excellent explanation and information about the optimiser.
September 8, 2011 at 3:36 pm
Good question and answer.
But the behaviour still seems bizarre to me. Why should the loop join hint be taken to imply the (Force Order) option - if I want...
September 8, 2011 at 9:44 am
SQLRNNR (9/7/2011)
Nice question. Thanks to DBCC Timewarp we were able to answer the Oct 14 question over a month early. :-D:-D:-D:-D
I'was just getting used to seeing Monday questions on...
September 8, 2011 at 3:27 am
Good easy question.
Of course it may be that the query processing could order the merge conditions in order of specificity. We did that with the pattern matching conditions of...
September 7, 2011 at 4:56 pm
A Good question.
But I thinl it might have been a better question if some extra options (pairs of ACID properties) had been provided, to give people an improved chance of...
September 7, 2011 at 4:34 pm
But of course one could say that the query processing ought to notice that there is no ambiguity in number 4, because any possible ambiguity is eliminated by the ON...
September 7, 2011 at 4:23 pm
Good question.
I got it wrong. Q1 is obviously wroing, and I immediately concluded it was all about "order by" and just skim the rest for "order by" related errors -...
September 7, 2011 at 4:13 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 5,476 through 5,490 (of 7,484 total)