Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,476 through 5,490 (of 7,484 total)

  • RE: Today's Random Word!

    Revenant (9/9/2011)


    bopeavy (9/9/2011)


    FRIDAY!

    Beer(s)!

    Wine(s)!

    I'm sticking to wine this evening. No beer. Well, maybe a beer at home before I go out and head for the bar, just to celebrate the...

  • RE: Another bug in SS?

    GilaMonster (9/9/2011)


    Oh, this fails too, but the complexities of nested (not) transactions is maybe overkill for a QotD (unless you're doing a 'what does this return' question)

    BEGIN TRANSACTION Tran1

    INSERT INTO...

  • RE: Another bug in SS?

    Ninja's_RGR'us (9/9/2011)


    Tom.Thomson (9/9/2011)


    edit: I see I should have looked more carefully at the first item.

    Then what's your opinion on this?

    That it doesn't show any buggy behaviour in 2008 R2(SP1).

    But, on...

  • RE: Another bug in SS?

    Ninja's_RGR'us (9/9/2011)


    Did I miss the memo where September 2k11 is bug month for sql server?

    I think I found another one today. Please confirm this is an issue on your...

  • RE: Database Mirroring Modes

    Nice and easy today.

  • RE: Data Warehouse best practices

    Ninja's_RGR'us (9/9/2011)


    So bottom line, 25 sec gets you maybe 2-5 failovers on a clustered server. I've heard they take only a couple seconds. But with such a little...

  • RE: Data Warehouse best practices

    Ninja's_RGR'us (9/8/2011)


    Five 9 means you are required to be up 99.999% of the time.

    I'm not sure about my math on this but it would mean that you have roughly 26...

  • RE: Data Warehouse best practices

    Gianluca Sartori (9/9/2011)


    ALZDBA (9/8/2011)


    I've seen systems where regular DWH processing is being halted during the load window.

    This way they free up resources on the dwh server and run ETL at...

  • RE: The Right Kind Of Join III

    Paul, thanks for that excellent explanation and information about the optimiser.

  • RE: The Right Kind Of Join III

    Good question and answer.

    But the behaviour still seems bizarre to me. Why should the loop join hint be taken to imply the (Force Order) option - if I want...

  • RE: Merge statement

    SQLRNNR (9/7/2011)


    Nice question. Thanks to DBCC Timewarp we were able to answer the Oct 14 question over a month early. :-D:-D:-D:-D

    I'was just getting used to seeing Monday questions on...

  • RE: Merge statement

    Good easy question.

    Of course it may be that the query processing could order the merge conditions in order of specificity. We did that with the pattern matching conditions of...

  • RE: ACID Properties

    A Good question.

    But I thinl it might have been a better question if some extra options (pairs of ACID properties) had been provided, to give people an improved chance of...

  • RE: Order By Clause

    But of course one could say that the query processing ought to notice that there is no ambiguity in number 4, because any possible ambiguity is eliminated by the ON...

  • RE: Order By Clause

    Good question.

    I got it wrong. Q1 is obviously wroing, and I immediately concluded it was all about "order by" and just skim the rest for "order by" related errors -...

Viewing 15 posts - 5,476 through 5,490 (of 7,484 total)