Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,401 through 5,415 (of 5,843 total)

  • RE: DBCC DBREINDEX not improving SCAN DENSITY

    Defragging tiny tables is a waste of time and effort. I usually set defrag scripts to ignore tables with less than somewhere between 50 and 500 pages, depending on...

  • RE: large number of databases

    icata (1/14/2008)


    ...The benchmark should be fairly close to my situation since the memory allocation for the procedure cache is similar in 2000 and 2005, as you guys pointed out. ......

  • RE: large number of databases

    noeld (1/14/2008)


    20,000 SP ?????.... that is BAD!!! I believe whoever created such thing did a lousy job.

    By the way after database 99 many stats are not gathered by SQL Server.

    Microsoft...

  • RE: large number of databases

    "Single box" = 1 physical server (or virtual server if you are using those - although that is definitely NOT a best practice for high-performance).

  • RE: large number of databases

    You should absolutely NOT us multiple instances on a single box to manage large numbers of databases. The various 'overheads' of multiple instances should be avoided (actually it should...

  • RE: large number of databases

    I have a client with 6600 databases. I now have them running efficiently on a single 2 CPU dual core 64bit box with terrible I/O underlying it. yes,...

  • RE: Deadlock issue need recommendations

    As Sergiy said, indexing could be a key here. But you should read and UNDERSTAND all of the material contained in parts 1-3 of this series by Bard Duncan...

  • RE: Dead lock issue

    I would think something like this would do it:

    BEGIN TRAN

    SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE

    --note: this will give your sproc another output set. I am not sure though if...

  • RE: Dead lock issue

    SriSun (1/13/2008)


    Hi,

    I finally changed my code (procedure) and came to this end.

    if not exists(select [name] from workspace.sys.tables where [name] = 'geoleveltbl')

    begin

    ...

  • RE: SQL SERVER 2005 vs ORACLE 10G

    HEY!! I bet we can have some fun with this. Let me start it off:

    O - Obtuse

    R - Repugnant

    A - Arcane

    C - Costly

    L - Lexical

    E - Executer

  • RE: why is my fragmentation so high on non-leaf index levels

    48GB sounds like a lot - unless you only have a few massive tables in the database. Don't forget too that sp_spaceused (if that is what you used to...

  • RE: why is my fragmentation so high on non-leaf index levels

    how much free space is there in the database and what is the growth increment for the data file(s)?

  • RE: SQL Defrag

    Sounds like it is time for you to trot out one of my favorite lines from the movie 'The Princess Bride' - "get used to disapointment". 😀

  • RE: Splitting Data Files

    I thought I did address your question directly: "you can see tremendous throughput improvement...". And the question cannot be answered as explicitly as you ask. I could...

  • RE: SQL Defrag

    Short answer - no. Long answer - well ... let ... me ... think ... for ... a ... while ... ... ... no. 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 5,401 through 5,415 (of 5,843 total)