Viewing 15 posts - 5,401 through 5,415 (of 5,841 total)
noeld (1/14/2008)
20,000 SP ?????.... that is BAD!!! I believe whoever created such thing did a lousy job.By the way after database 99 many stats are not gathered by SQL Server.
Microsoft...
January 14, 2008 at 2:19 pm
"Single box" = 1 physical server (or virtual server if you are using those - although that is definitely NOT a best practice for high-performance).
January 14, 2008 at 12:44 pm
You should absolutely NOT us multiple instances on a single box to manage large numbers of databases. The various 'overheads' of multiple instances should be avoided (actually it should...
January 14, 2008 at 10:02 am
I have a client with 6600 databases. I now have them running efficiently on a single 2 CPU dual core 64bit box with terrible I/O underlying it. yes,...
January 14, 2008 at 9:33 am
As Sergiy said, indexing could be a key here. But you should read and UNDERSTAND all of the material contained in parts 1-3 of this series by Bard Duncan...
January 14, 2008 at 9:17 am
I would think something like this would do it:
BEGIN TRAN
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE
--note: this will give your sproc another output set. I am not sure though if...
January 14, 2008 at 8:28 am
SriSun (1/13/2008)
I finally changed my code (procedure) and came to this end.
if not exists(select [name] from workspace.sys.tables where [name] = 'geoleveltbl')
begin
...
January 13, 2008 at 4:29 pm
HEY!! I bet we can have some fun with this. Let me start it off:
O - Obtuse
R - Repugnant
A - Arcane
C - Costly
L - Lexical
E - Executer
January 11, 2008 at 11:00 pm
48GB sounds like a lot - unless you only have a few massive tables in the database. Don't forget too that sp_spaceused (if that is what you used to...
January 11, 2008 at 3:38 pm
how much free space is there in the database and what is the growth increment for the data file(s)?
January 11, 2008 at 3:07 pm
Sounds like it is time for you to trot out one of my favorite lines from the movie 'The Princess Bride' - "get used to disapointment". 😀
January 11, 2008 at 3:04 pm
I thought I did address your question directly: "you can see tremendous throughput improvement...". And the question cannot be answered as explicitly as you ask. I could...
January 11, 2008 at 9:54 am
Short answer - no. Long answer - well ... let ... me ... think ... for ... a ... while ... ... ... no. 🙂
January 11, 2008 at 8:05 am
1) It has been my experience that queries are almost NEVER as optimized as my clients think they are.
2) You can pick up tremendous throughput improvements with appropriate data placement.
3)...
January 11, 2008 at 8:01 am
Andre Mair (1/10/2008)
In my opinionSmall Database SQL Server (less than say 50GB)
Huge Database Oracle (anything more than 50GB)
That is exactly the kind of statement I was addressing when...
January 10, 2008 at 12:22 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 5,401 through 5,415 (of 5,841 total)