Viewing 15 posts - 5,086 through 5,100 (of 5,843 total)
GermanDBA (7/3/2008)
sorry to (slightly)swerve from the question, but isn't a fill factor of 0 exactly the same as 100 and not almost the same as? I thought I...
July 3, 2008 at 8:23 am
As far as 1 day or 10 days data access, assuming an index (either clustered or non) AND roughly smooth data distribution levels, you should have an index seek/bookmark lookup...
July 3, 2008 at 8:20 am
Lots of people here have thrown out the DBA Architect roll. But I don't know that most Sr DBAs have what it takes to move into that roll, especially...
July 3, 2008 at 8:14 am
There are more and more companies offering production dba support as a service. Thus I think this class of employee will be less in demand with laid-off types bloating...
July 3, 2008 at 8:06 am
Mohammad Irfan (7/2/2008)
rw_ebox (7/2/2008)
If your environment is MS SQL 2005 + SP2, the best choice is SQL Server 2005 Performance Dashboard. It is a free download software.http://www.sql-server-performance.com/articles/per/bm_performance_dashboard_2005_p1.aspx
Cant do anything on...
July 3, 2008 at 6:42 am
Does this server have a non-default max memory setting? You should do that for every server, and it will probably prevent the issue you are seeing.
July 2, 2008 at 8:23 am
In given case it isn't a datatype declaration, just not using the correct type due to the cast. I assume you were doing 101 convert to remove the time...
July 1, 2008 at 6:58 am
Another very good thing to look for in query plans is low estimates with telephone numbers for actual rows.
My first cut at a profiler run at a new...
July 1, 2008 at 6:52 am
I'm hoping that this 'bad query' was the culprit in the performances issues I was having - it would have been running on the morning of my attempted server switch....
June 30, 2008 at 2:08 pm
I will just point out 1 thing here (not much to add since we have essentially no details to offer advice on thus far) is that a logical IO doesn't...
June 30, 2008 at 9:00 am
1) In general the optimizer is much better in 2005 than 2000. However, there were a BUNCH of regressions - queries that perform slower on 2005 than 2000. ...
June 30, 2008 at 8:55 am
zach_john (6/27/2008)
June 27, 2008 at 11:27 am
Personally I think this is a time to call Microsoft Product Support.
June 27, 2008 at 7:32 am
At each of my last 3 SQL 2005 performance tuning/analysis client gigs I have addressed tremendous performance issues by removing the use of TVFs (and also table variables). It...
June 27, 2008 at 7:30 am
jim.powers (6/26/2008)
TheSQLGuru (6/26/2008)
June 26, 2008 at 7:46 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 5,086 through 5,100 (of 5,843 total)