Viewing 15 posts - 3,691 through 3,705 (of 5,843 total)
You are going about this the wrong way. What is MORE important (usually) than a single bad plan is how bad things are IN AGGREGATE. Which is more...
January 20, 2011 at 9:11 am
dant12 (1/14/2011)
if on SQL 2008 issueALTER TABLE table SET (LOCK_ESCALATION = DISABLE)
to disable lock escalation on that table, after that sql server will respect locking hints
Incorrect. Per BOL:
DISABLE
Prevents lock...
January 14, 2011 at 10:09 am
chrisph (1/11/2011)
January 14, 2011 at 8:48 am
malleswarareddy_m (1/11/2011)
so restore entire dtabase is not possible.I want to restore only one table...
January 14, 2011 at 8:46 am
PLEASE read this carefully before you lock pages in memory:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918483
“You should make additional considerations before you assign the ‘Lock pages in memory’ user right. If you assign this user right...
January 14, 2011 at 8:41 am
I am not too clear on exactly what you need here, but I will say that the way to handle complex string manipulations is to break them down into single...
January 14, 2011 at 8:39 am
Roy Ernest (1/14/2011)
You are a bad Kiwi... You wont even let me have one small victory? 😀 Thanks for correcting me.. 🙂 That part I did not give much notice.
I...
January 14, 2011 at 8:33 am
1) different CPUs/motherboards in the two servers could have a significant affect on query performance
2) if your new box has win2008+, is power mode in the default balanced configuration? ...
January 14, 2011 at 8:29 am
IIRC there is a trace flag to change the locking escalation behavior. But you best be VERY careful if you decide to implement it. And it still doesn't...
January 14, 2011 at 8:22 am
I would like to add that additional tuning is often required as data volumes grow - and you can't really know that without actually testing with the larger volumes. ...
January 14, 2011 at 8:20 am
Dynamic SQL is by far the best way to handle this type of scenario I think. I have gotten 5 orders of magnitude performance improvement by using it for...
January 14, 2011 at 8:17 am
GilaMonster (1/13/2011)
sachnam (1/13/2011)
1. will shrinking always shrink your log file even if it is in use?
No, and repeatedly shrinking logs is not recommended.
2. Why to run a full backup after...
January 14, 2011 at 6:51 am
Peter Trast (1/13/2011)
Koen (da-zero) (1/13/2011)
Grant Fritchey (1/13/2011)
Koen (da-zero) (1/12/2011)
TheSQLGuru (1/12/2011)
I am curious what you mean by "advisor" here. Hopefully you do NOT mean Database Tuning Advisor!! Avoid that...
January 13, 2011 at 1:28 pm
>>For the foreseeable future, the best answer is, get someone in who can tune your structures and your queries.
Not true Grant!! I can ALWAYS make time for some...
January 13, 2011 at 10:21 am
1) don't put the clustered index on the table and the order by and then run the two versions. Virtually identical timing and resource usage on my mid-grade laptop.
2)...
January 12, 2011 at 7:10 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 3,691 through 3,705 (of 5,843 total)