Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 1,315 total)
SQL 2005 x64 will keep grabbing memory as long as nothing else on the system is using it, even if there is very little work for it to do.
But it...
January 19, 2007 at 2:36 pm
You would probably see a performance decrease by splitting a single drive, because you've probably added a lot more head movement as the disk has to constantly jump back and...
January 19, 2007 at 2:08 pm
There are complicated permission issues with asking a server to use the Jet driver to open a file on another server. Try to figure out what the exact issue is. ...
January 19, 2007 at 1:32 pm
I feel a disturbance in the Force, like the sound of 16 64-bit cores suddenly screaming for more RAM.
January 19, 2007 at 10:40 am
On my BOL toolbar there is a group of three buttons between "Help Favorites" and "Ask a Question". The button on the right is "Sync with Table of Contents". It...
January 19, 2007 at 10:31 am
Your mileage may vary, but we saw duration of large processes drop from several hours to 10-20 minutes after going to a new x64 SQL Enterprise server with 24GB RAM.
Previous...
January 19, 2007 at 8:09 am
If you script all database objects and run the script in a new database, you'll find out very quickly which views and procedures are invalid because of references to tables or...
January 17, 2007 at 8:39 am
I wasn't trying to be a smartalec, sorry if it came off that way. I was trying to emphasize that the name you use for the table alias is completely...
January 16, 2007 at 2:15 pm
The quick answer is that you left out an alias. Any time you use a derived table subquery you have to name it, so it should look like:
)
January 16, 2007 at 11:46 am
That whole subquery is just to generate test data. Each of the UNIONed SELECT statements generates one record.
You would replace FROM (...) as rents with FROM <renttable>, where <renttable> is...
January 15, 2007 at 9:18 am
I ran into the same problem, and I wish I had a good solution. I gave up on the maintenance plan cleanup task and wrote my own procedure, using "xp_cmdshell...
January 15, 2007 at 9:05 am
Your query is too complicated to read and debug.
My first suggestion is to add a derived table subquery to define the common expressions so you don't have to repeat the...
January 12, 2007 at 2:49 pm
The partitioned table is spread all over your disk, while the tables from the partitioned view are much more localized in the primary filegroup. The only way to get a...
January 11, 2007 at 7:09 am
The only reason we're still talking about this is that the original poster seems to be unconvinced that partitioned tables are superior, and the only reason I can think of...
January 10, 2007 at 2:19 pm
Why worry about partitioned views? You can create a partitioning scheme that maps the partitions for each year into the same filegroup (presumably PRIMARY). Then you have one table, one...
January 10, 2007 at 1:54 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 1,315 total)