Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 1,315 total)

  • RE: Memory

    SQL 2005 x64 will keep grabbing memory as long as nothing else on the system is using it, even if there is very little work for it to do.

    But it...

  • RE: Disk Configuration Question

    You would probably see a performance decrease by splitting a single drive, because you've probably added a lot more head movement as the disk has to constantly jump back and...

  • RE: Importing From An Access DB

    There are complicated permission issues with asking a server to use the Jet driver to open a file on another server.  Try to figure out what the exact issue is. ...

  • RE: Installing SQL 2005 Developer Edition x64 and SP1 - Integration Services

    I feel a disturbance in the Force, like the sound of 16 64-bit cores suddenly screaming for more RAM.

  • RE: Where is Locate button in BOL 2005 ?

    On my BOL toolbar there is a group of three buttons between "Help Favorites" and "Ask a Question".  The button on the right is "Sync with Table of Contents".  It...

  • RE: Max Memory for SQL Server 2005 standard edition

    Your mileage may vary, but we saw duration of large processes drop from several hours to 10-20 minutes after going to a new x64 SQL Enterprise server with 24GB RAM.

    Previous...

  • RE: To find Invalid Objects in SQL Server Database

    If you script all database objects and run the script in a new database, you'll find out very quickly which views and procedures are invalid because of references to tables or...

  • RE: Nested Case Statement

    I wasn't trying to be a smartalec, sorry if it came off that way.  I was trying to emphasize that the name you use for the table alias is completely...

  • RE: Nested Case Statement

    The quick answer is that you left out an alias.  Any time you use a derived table subquery you have to name it, so it should look like:

    )

  • RE: Nested Case Statement

    That whole subquery is just to generate test data.  Each of the UNIONed SELECT statements generates one record.

    You would replace FROM (...) as rents with FROM <renttable>, where <renttable> is...

  • RE: Maintenance cleanup task not functioning as planned

    I ran into the same problem, and I wish I had a good solution.  I gave up on the maintenance plan cleanup task and wrote my own procedure, using "xp_cmdshell...

  • RE: Nested Case Statement

    Your query is too complicated to read and debug.

    My first suggestion is to add a derived table subquery to define the common expressions so you don't have to repeat the...

  • RE: Design Advice - Partitioned Views or Partitioned Tables?

    The partitioned table is spread all over your disk, while the tables from the partitioned view are much more localized in the primary filegroup.  The only way to get a...

  • RE: Design Advice - Partitioned Views or Partitioned Tables?

    The only reason we're still talking about this is that the original poster seems to be unconvinced that partitioned tables are superior, and the only reason I can think of...

  • RE: Design Advice - Partitioned Views or Partitioned Tables?

    Why worry about partitioned views?  You can create a partitioning scheme that maps the partitions for each year into the same filegroup (presumably PRIMARY).  Then you have one table, one...

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 1,315 total)