Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 519 total)
LMAO.....
That's generally the way I've seen developers learn to pay attention to DBA's
I call it "letting that ole dog knaw a little", and you'd be surprised how many times they...
December 4, 2002 at 1:21 pm
Yes, it would. However, it would also be removed if run successfully through a manual start. Are you sure it ran successfully when you kicked it off manually?
And Has it...
December 4, 2002 at 1:15 pm
IndexID of 0 means no index, heap structure from table
IndexId of 1 is the clustered index
IndexId of 2-254 are nonclustered indexes
IndexId of 255 is entry for text or image values...
December 4, 2002 at 1:11 pm
Refresh your view, and see if it goes away....
December 4, 2002 at 11:45 am
Rows and Rowcnt hold the same definition. Rows was added for backwards compatibility.
December 4, 2002 at 11:42 am
Also, in EM, when I right-click properties a table, it tells me the number of records in the table. Does anyone know how this number is generated?
That number comes from...
December 4, 2002 at 11:37 am
quote:
You would be better off with 6 smaller drives instead of 3 larger drives. your capacity would be higher (only 1/6th of space lost) and your response marginally better provided...
December 4, 2002 at 11:09 am
Antares686 is right about the cost being less for set.
December 4, 2002 at 10:51 am
Pre-validate you data before attempting the conversion.
IsNumeric() would work in your example.
December 4, 2002 at 9:54 am
Very good article. I also agree with John and Steve. IT DOES exist to support the business and all too often IT holds the business hostage due to the technical...
December 3, 2002 at 5:00 pm
Having done this myself several times now, I would strongly suggest a bcp out of the data, scripting of the database, and building of a new database.
Should I have said...
December 3, 2002 at 4:35 pm
Back in versions 4.2, 6.0, and 6.5 it made a VERY MAJOR difference. It was part of a DBA's job in optimizing queries. With the "Optimizer" in todays versions, it...
December 1, 2002 at 12:45 pm
I saw it used once in a company I worked for. They used it for archive jobs which removed rows one at a time based on a datetime field. It...
November 29, 2002 at 8:08 pm
Add another event_date column to your output that is not converted, sort by the unconverted event_date and group by both (with the same value, it wouldn't change your grouping).
Or you...
November 28, 2002 at 9:52 pm
That IS a good explanation Greg.
Edited by - Scorpion_66 on 11/25/2002 4:38:56 PM
November 25, 2002 at 4:38 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 519 total)