Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 447 total)
Since the server with same name is in different domain you should not see any issue. My manager had asked me to upgrade one 2005 production server to SQL...
January 12, 2009 at 12:45 pm
-- we have about 3000 users potentially hitting this sql server, and about 4000 active connections.
Is this statement right? Is there no connection pooling?
January 12, 2009 at 12:38 pm
From various projects what ever I had learned, the most important thing is the say " NO " very diplomatically. First I use to say " NO " very...
January 12, 2009 at 9:54 am
Anirban Paul (1/9/2009)
Nice article...:)
Just curious ! ! !
Why Anirban always had same response to all articles ?
January 9, 2009 at 9:24 am
Don't know about 2008 but once tried to move mssqlsystemresource database in SQL server 2005 and all hell broke for me. Have to install and configure complete server again.
With last...
January 9, 2009 at 7:40 am
I don't think its possible. Always detache a database that is currently not in use.
January 8, 2009 at 2:18 pm
I think answer should be option 1 and 3.
-- Impersonating allows a member of the sysadmin fixed server role or db_owner fixed database role to impersonate another user
January 6, 2009 at 8:29 am
There is no hard rule from MS to specify this number. Basic number for analysis is taken as 300 and afterwards it just depending on you application and server...
January 6, 2009 at 8:17 am
check this: point 3 in http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/bestpractice/oltp-performance-issues.mspx
or go through this thread in sqlservercentral.
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic302812-65-1.aspx#bm303097
January 6, 2009 at 8:08 am
USE Databasename
GO
DBCC SHRINKFILE (Databasename_data, 1)
GO
I put " 1 " as target in most of the time since it will take the nearest value to shrink that file.
January 5, 2009 at 1:30 pm
We had this issue sometime back and changing the max degree of parallelism to 1 had increased performance a lot. Mine was a 8 processor and 4 dual core...
January 5, 2009 at 1:04 pm
I assumed 32 is the max limit but its 50.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432(SQL.90).aspx
50 instances on a stand-alone server for all SQL Server 2005 editions except for Workgroup Edition. Workgroup Edition supports a maximum...
January 5, 2009 at 11:21 am
Jason Shadonix (1/2/2009)
Just out of curiosity, anyone ever actually created (or seen) a server with 50 instances of SQL installed on it? Most I've ever done is 6.
NO. ...
January 5, 2009 at 11:17 am
I wasn't sure about " Remote " option. But since from last two days all options are correct, I selected Remote option.
Can some one post a sample query or...
December 29, 2008 at 10:28 am
Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 447 total)