Viewing 15 posts - 17,071 through 17,085 (of 19,564 total)
reidres (2/22/2010)
Well I have to dispute the scalability of Jeff's implied solution and also think it is clunky and not intuitive.
Why do you think it is clunky?
I cringe...
February 22, 2010 at 2:27 pm
No. Did not know it was a kids game. Interesting insight.
February 22, 2010 at 12:44 pm
Jeff Moden (2/22/2010)
FizzBuzz 😛
Which sparks a question - why is it called FIZZBUZZ?
Is it because you get a Buzz from the Fizz of a Cola?
February 22, 2010 at 12:25 pm
Sean-752587 (2/22/2010)
As far as scaleability is concerned, I did try it with 1 Mil. rows which didn't work in my master database (SQL 2008 dev edition). It topped out at...
February 22, 2010 at 12:13 pm
Thanks for the article. I tend to use the method similar to what Paul described.
February 22, 2010 at 11:56 am
jcrawf02 (2/22/2010)
Sean, on yours, casting is unneccessary until the ELSE, and makes...
February 22, 2010 at 10:45 am
GSquared (2/22/2010)
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @Table1 TABLE (
ID int IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY,
Number int);
DECLARE @Number INT;
SELECT @Number = 1;
WHILE @Number <= 100
BEGIN
INSERT INTO @Table1 (Number)
SELECT...
February 22, 2010 at 9:41 am
J.Faehrmann (2/22/2010)
It performs well enough.
DECLARE @i INT
SET @i = 1
WHILE...
February 22, 2010 at 8:08 am
February 21, 2010 at 10:57 pm
Jeff Moden (2/21/2010)
February 21, 2010 at 10:29 pm
These sorts of questions could be good. They could also lead down the slippery slope. If speed over quality is the most important - you will end up...
February 21, 2010 at 6:37 pm
RBarryYoung (2/21/2010)
CirquedeSQLeil (2/21/2010)
The difficult thing is ensuring that people read it. Just like a Terms & Conditions...
February 21, 2010 at 5:57 pm
RainbowFfolly (2/21/2010)
...I must admit the idea of the dozen or so articles people get pointed to intrigues me; what areas do they cover?
Check the article by Gail Shaw in my...
February 21, 2010 at 4:47 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 17,071 through 17,085 (of 19,564 total)