Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 279 total)
I need to see when I can dedicate a day to that.... Invariably, all that can fail will, so I will end up redoing my PC 😀
Mind you, only the...
August 12, 2009 at 10:00 am
Yup, but I am not even sure if rebuilding my system will work.... If I use the same 2008 media, I will more than likely end up with the same...
August 12, 2009 at 9:38 am
Seems to be a different issue. MSXML 6.0 uninstalled/re-installed without issues..... and even after this I can't install 2008 SP1....
August 12, 2009 at 9:22 am
Thanks Jeffrey. Came across the same link, and am trying now to get this to work without editing the database..... I'll post results.
August 12, 2009 at 9:11 am
It is failing with a message like you can see in attached file
Searching a bit for it, there might be some solutions I can test.... I'll try at least 🙂
August 12, 2009 at 8:20 am
Ok, if it is the "final" version, why does it fail to install the Tools (which includes SSMS) on my desktop when I try to install 2008 SP1?
August 11, 2009 at 6:30 pm
I am still surprised on how people emit opinions after (hopefully) having read this thread and stating again obviously wrong comments.....
August 11, 2009 at 6:38 am
... I just took some time to read trough your posts on this site and realize that it indeed seems to be your way of expression, and again, I did...
August 7, 2009 at 11:47 am
We all can disagree... and that is what makes some threads more interesting..maybe my choice of words was not correct.... I did not mean attacking them personally, but their opinions........
August 7, 2009 at 11:18 am
talltop (8/7/2009)
Uh oh! thread hijack...GSquared, stay on point dude. We are talking about corporate production databases, not automobiles... apples and oranges....
Umm... we seem to have a little attitude problem here?...
August 7, 2009 at 11:01 am
It should perfectly work.... I use SSMS 2008 to take care of our 2008, 2005 and 2000 servers....
August 7, 2009 at 10:11 am
Charles, copy-only backups were introduced SQL Server 2005...... See here
August 7, 2009 at 10:08 am
... probably because of their practice of "It is subject to removal in future releases or service packs of 64-bit SQL Server." 😀
August 7, 2009 at 9:35 am
Warren Peace (8/6/2009)
First, AWE is not an option on x64 hardware because it is not needed. You don't have to check the box to enable it - it is...
August 7, 2009 at 8:59 am
Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 279 total)